Message ID | pull.734.v2.git.1600725687.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Inclusive naming, part II | expand |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:21PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > Changes since v1: > > * Instead of using the name primary for the adjustments to > t/test-terminal.perl, we follow Python's lead (which uses the > parent/child nomenclature). > * The changes to t3200 no longer use variations of the name main as branch > names; Instead, the renamed branches are independent from any current or > future default branch name. Thanks, I think that does look nicer. Shouldn't the latter bullet apply to most of the ones in patch 4, though? I wonder if they should simply be "s/master/topic/" instead of "s/master/main". -Peff
Hi Peff, On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:21PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > Changes since v1: > > > > * Instead of using the name primary for the adjustments to > > t/test-terminal.perl, we follow Python's lead (which uses the > > parent/child nomenclature). > > * The changes to t3200 no longer use variations of the name main as branch > > names; Instead, the renamed branches are independent from any current or > > future default branch name. > > Thanks, I think that does look nicer. Shouldn't the latter bullet apply > to most of the ones in patch 4, though? > > I wonder if they should simply be "s/master/topic/" instead of > "s/master/main". Yes! I did that in 4/5. In 5/5, we need a branch name that starts with the same two letters as `maint`, though. I amended the commit message accordingly. Thanks, Dscho
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 06:29:50AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Thanks, I think that does look nicer. Shouldn't the latter bullet apply > > to most of the ones in patch 4, though? > > > > I wonder if they should simply be "s/master/topic/" instead of > > "s/master/main". > > Yes! I did that in 4/5. In 5/5, we need a branch name that starts with the > same two letters as `maint`, though. I amended the commit message > accordingly. That makes sense, and your commit message is clear. All of your v3 looks good to me. Thanks for your patience on these rather tedious changes. :) -Peff