diff mbox series

[4/9] submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it

Message ID 20180917213559.126404-5-sbeller@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series fetch: make sure submodule oids are fetched | expand

Commit Message

Stefan Beller Sept. 17, 2018, 9:35 p.m. UTC 
We can string_list_insert() to maintain sorted-ness of the
list as we find new items, or we can string_list_append() to
build an unsorted list and sort it at the end just once.

To pick which one is more appropriate, we notice the fact
that we discover new items more or less in the already
sorted order.  That makes "append then sort" more
appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 submodule.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index d29dfa3d1f5..c6eff7699f3 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@  static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
 			if (!submodule ||
-			    !unsorted_string_list_lookup(
+			    !string_list_lookup(
 					&changed_submodule_names,
 					submodule->name))
 				continue;
@@ -1350,6 +1350,7 @@  int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
 	/* default value, "--submodule-prefix" and its value are added later */
 
 	calculate_changed_submodule_paths();
+	string_list_sort(&changed_submodule_names);
 	run_processes_parallel(max_parallel_jobs,
 			       get_next_submodule,
 			       fetch_start_failure,