@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ static int skip_first_line;
static void add_work(struct grep_opt *opt, const struct grep_source *gs)
{
+ static int count;
+
grep_lock();
while ((todo_end+1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo) == todo_done) {
@@ -108,6 +110,7 @@ static void add_work(struct grep_opt *opt, const struct grep_source *gs)
todo_end = (todo_end + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo);
pthread_cond_signal(&cond_add);
+ fprintf(stderr, "added work item %3d\n", ++count);
grep_unlock();
}
@@ -173,6 +176,7 @@ static void *run(void *arg)
int hit = 0;
struct grep_opt *opt = arg;
+ sleep(2);
while (1) {
struct work_item *w = get_work();
if (!w)
Of course, just removing the +1 after todo_end would be instant
deadlock, since nothing would ever change todo_end or todo_done from
0.
The problem boils down to the fact that arithmetic mod 128 cannot
capture the 129 possible values of end-done (which
is (end-start)+(start-done), i.e. the total number of items waiting to
be picked up or that have been picked up by a worker).
To fix this, don't keep the todo_* variables reduced mod 128, and only
do that when using them as indices into todo[]. Then we can rewrite
the condition in add_work() to the proper one: Wait until todo_end is
not a full round ahead of todo_done.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
builtin/grep.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void add_work(struct grep_opt *opt, const struct grep_source *gs)
grep_lock();
- while ((todo_end+1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo) == todo_done) {
+ while (todo_end - todo_done == ARRAY_SIZE(todo)) {
pthread_cond_wait(&cond_write, &grep_mutex);
}
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void add_work(struct grep_opt *opt, const struct grep_source *gs)
grep_source_load_driver(&w->source, opt->repo->index);
w->done = 0;
strbuf_reset(&w->out);
- todo_end = (todo_end + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo);
+ todo_end += 1;
pthread_cond_signal(&cond_add);
grep_unlock();
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static struct work_item *get_work(void)
ret = NULL;
} else {
ret = todo_item(todo_start);
- todo_start = (todo_start + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo);
+ todo_start += 1;
}
grep_unlock();
return ret;
@@ -144,8 +144,7 @@ static void work_done(struct work_item *w)
grep_lock();
w->done = 1;
old_done = todo_done;
- for(; todo_done != todo_start;
- todo_done = (todo_done+1) % ARRAY_SIZE(todo)) {
+ for(; todo_done != todo_start; todo_done += 1) {
w = todo_item(todo_done);
if (!w->done)
break;