diff mbox series

fetch-pack: send server options after command

Message ID 20190522200822.176870-1-jonathantanmy@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series fetch-pack: send server options after command | expand

Commit Message

Jonathan Tan May 22, 2019, 8:08 p.m. UTC
Currently, if any server options are specified during a protocol v2
fetch, server options will be sent before "command=fetch". Write server
options to the request buffer in send_fetch_request() so that the
components of the request are sent in the correct order.

The protocol documentation states that the command must come first. The
Git server implementation in serve.c (see process_request() in that
file) tolerates any order of command and capability, which is perhaps
why we haven't noticed this. This was noticed when testing against a
JGit server implementation, which follows the documentation in this
regard.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
---
 fetch-pack.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jonathan Nieder May 24, 2019, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #1
Jonathan Tan wrote:

> Currently, if any server options are specified during a protocol v2
> fetch, server options will be sent before "command=fetch". Write server
> options to the request buffer in send_fetch_request() so that the
> components of the request are sent in the correct order.
>
> The protocol documentation states that the command must come first. The
> Git server implementation in serve.c (see process_request() in that
> file) tolerates any order of command and capability, which is perhaps
> why we haven't noticed this. This was noticed when testing against a
> JGit server implementation, which follows the documentation in this
> regard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> ---
>  fetch-pack.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Oh, dear.  Thanks for fixing it.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

6e98305985 (clone: send server options when using protocol v2,
2019-04-12) is part of release candidates, but it looks like we caught
this in time to get the fix in before the release.

Should we add an interop test for this to t/interop/?

Thanks,
Jonathan
Junio C Hamano May 28, 2019, 6 p.m. UTC | #2
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

> Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
>> Currently, if any server options are specified during a protocol v2
>> fetch, server options will be sent before "command=fetch". Write server
>> options to the request buffer in send_fetch_request() so that the
>> components of the request are sent in the correct order.
>>
>> The protocol documentation states that the command must come first. The
>> Git server implementation in serve.c (see process_request() in that
>> file) tolerates any order of command and capability, which is perhaps
>> why we haven't noticed this. This was noticed when testing against a
>> JGit server implementation, which follows the documentation in this
>> regard.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
>> ---
>>  fetch-pack.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Oh, dear.  Thanks for fixing it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>


Yeah, looks good.  Thanks.

>
> 6e98305985 (clone: send server options when using protocol v2,
> 2019-04-12) is part of release candidates, but it looks like we caught
> this in time to get the fix in before the release.
>
> Should we add an interop test for this to t/interop/?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
index 3f24d0c8a6..1c10f54e78 100644
--- a/fetch-pack.c
+++ b/fetch-pack.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@  static int send_fetch_request(struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator, int fd_out,
 	    server_supports_v2("server-option", 1)) {
 		int i;
 		for (i = 0; i < args->server_options->nr; i++)
-			packet_write_fmt(fd_out, "server-option=%s",
+			packet_buf_write(&req_buf, "server-option=%s",
 					 args->server_options->items[i].string);
 	}