Message ID | 20230903151132.739136-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 82af2c639c4dc9a5311ec4ab97dff44a93d6798d |
Headers | show |
Series | sequencer: fix error message on failure to copy SQUASH_MSG | expand |
On 03/09/2023 16:11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > The message talked about renaming, while the actual action is copying. > This was introduced by 6e98de72c ("sequencer (rebase -i): add support > for the 'fixup' and 'squash' commands", 2017-01-02). > > Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> > > --- > i didn't try verifying whether the action shouldn't be actually be a > move, as i'm getting lost in this forest of files. This looks good, thanks. I think copying the file is OK. We're creating .git/SQUASH_MSG as a convenience in case the user decides to commit the conflict resolution themselves rather than leaving it to "rebase --continue". I don't think we reuse the contents of rebase_path_squash_msg() when tho rebase continues but copying it certainly isn't wrong and we're not in a hot path where we need to worry about the cost of copying a small file. Best Wishes Phillip > Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> > Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > > --- > totally on a tangent, does someone feel like teaching copy_file() to try > ioctl(FICLONE) (i.e., reflink) first? > --- > sequencer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > index a66dcf8ab2..2f3d7d4eee 100644 > --- a/sequencer.c > +++ b/sequencer.c > @@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ static int do_pick_commit(struct repository *r, > const char *dest = git_path_squash_msg(r); > unlink(dest); > if (copy_file(dest, rebase_path_squash_msg(), 0666)) { > - res = error(_("could not rename '%s' to '%s'"), > + res = error(_("could not copy '%s' to '%s'"), > rebase_path_squash_msg(), dest); > goto leave; > }
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c index a66dcf8ab2..2f3d7d4eee 100644 --- a/sequencer.c +++ b/sequencer.c @@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ static int do_pick_commit(struct repository *r, const char *dest = git_path_squash_msg(r); unlink(dest); if (copy_file(dest, rebase_path_squash_msg(), 0666)) { - res = error(_("could not rename '%s' to '%s'"), + res = error(_("could not copy '%s' to '%s'"), rebase_path_squash_msg(), dest); goto leave; }
The message talked about renaming, while the actual action is copying. This was introduced by 6e98de72c ("sequencer (rebase -i): add support for the 'fixup' and 'squash' commands", 2017-01-02). Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> --- i didn't try verifying whether the action shouldn't be actually be a move, as i'm getting lost in this forest of files. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> --- totally on a tangent, does someone feel like teaching copy_file() to try ioctl(FICLONE) (i.e., reflink) first? --- sequencer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)