Message ID | 20231109071312.GC2698043@coredump.intra.peff.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 92de4c5d56d084325997ca057701b65a9e79276a |
Headers | show |
Series | some more chunk-file bounds-checks fixes | expand |
diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c index 5d7d7a89e5..d9fc08de86 100644 --- a/commit-graph.c +++ b/commit-graph.c @@ -2690,10 +2690,6 @@ static int verify_one_commit_graph(struct repository *r, struct commit *seen_gen_zero = NULL; struct commit *seen_gen_non_zero = NULL; - verify_commit_graph_error = verify_commit_graph_lite(g); - if (verify_commit_graph_error) - return verify_commit_graph_error; - if (!commit_graph_checksum_valid(g)) { graph_report(_("the commit-graph file has incorrect checksum and is likely corrupt")); verify_commit_graph_error = VERIFY_COMMIT_GRAPH_ERROR_HASH;
The idea of verify_commit_graph_lite() is to have cheap verification checks both for everyday use of the graph files (to avoid out of bounds reads, etc) as well as for doing a full check via "commit-graph verify" (which will also check the hash, etc). But the expensive verification checks operate on a commit_graph struct, which we get by using the normal everyday-reader code! So any problem we'd find by calling it would have been found before we even got to the verify_one_commit_graph() function. Removing it simplifies the code a bit, but also frees us up to move the "lite" verification steps around within that everyday-reader code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- commit-graph.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)