Message ID | 4f8d015d54376af277883f57e8b4cf2c63ed8a03.1618910364.git.liu.denton@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | git-completion.bash: fixes on top of 'dl/complete-stash' | expand |
On Tue, Apr 20 2021, Denton Liu wrote: > The $subcommand case statement in _git_stash() is quite repetitive. > Consolidate the cases together into one catch-all case to reduce the > repetition. > > Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> > --- > contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 21 ++------------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > index 30c9a97616..7bce9a0112 100644 > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > @@ -3032,21 +3032,6 @@ _git_stash () > fi > > case "$subcommand,$cur" in > - push,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_push > - ;; > - save,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_save > - ;; > - pop,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_pop > - ;; > - apply,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_apply > - ;; > - drop,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_drop > - ;; > list,--*) > # NEEDSWORK: can we somehow unify this with the options in _git_log() and _git_show() > __gitcomp_builtin stash_list "$__git_log_common_options $__git_diff_common_options" > @@ -3054,8 +3039,8 @@ _git_stash () > show,--*) > __gitcomp_builtin stash_show "$__git_diff_common_options" > ;; > - branch,--*) > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_branch > + *,--*) > + __gitcomp_builtin "stash_$subcommand" > ;; > branch,*) > if [ $cword -eq $((__git_cmd_idx+2)) ]; then > @@ -3069,8 +3054,6 @@ _git_stash () > __gitcomp_nl "$(__git stash list \ > | sed -n -e 's/:.*//p')" > ;; > - *) > - ;; > esac > } One might think that this introduces a logic error in "git stash doesnotexist" now dispatching to a non-existing "stash_doesnotexist" or something, bu tI see that earlier (omitted from context) in the function there's an exhaustive lit of push/save/pop etc. which guards against this, is is that correct?
Hi Ævar, On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20 2021, Denton Liu wrote: > > > The $subcommand case statement in _git_stash() is quite repetitive. > > Consolidate the cases together into one catch-all case to reduce the > > repetition. > > > > Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> > > --- > > contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 21 ++------------------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > index 30c9a97616..7bce9a0112 100644 > > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash > > @@ -3032,21 +3032,6 @@ _git_stash () > > fi > > > > case "$subcommand,$cur" in > > - push,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_push > > - ;; > > - save,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_save > > - ;; > > - pop,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_pop > > - ;; > > - apply,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_apply > > - ;; > > - drop,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_drop > > - ;; > > list,--*) > > # NEEDSWORK: can we somehow unify this with the options in _git_log() and _git_show() > > __gitcomp_builtin stash_list "$__git_log_common_options $__git_diff_common_options" > > @@ -3054,8 +3039,8 @@ _git_stash () > > show,--*) > > __gitcomp_builtin stash_show "$__git_diff_common_options" > > ;; > > - branch,--*) > > - __gitcomp_builtin stash_branch > > + *,--*) > > + __gitcomp_builtin "stash_$subcommand" > > ;; > > branch,*) > > if [ $cword -eq $((__git_cmd_idx+2)) ]; then > > @@ -3069,8 +3054,6 @@ _git_stash () > > __gitcomp_nl "$(__git stash list \ > > | sed -n -e 's/:.*//p')" > > ;; > > - *) > > - ;; > > esac > > } > > One might think that this introduces a logic error in "git stash > doesnotexist" now dispatching to a non-existing "stash_doesnotexist" or > something, bu tI see that earlier (omitted from context) in the function > there's an exhaustive lit of push/save/pop etc. which guards against > this, is is that correct? Yep, that's exactly correct.
diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash index 30c9a97616..7bce9a0112 100644 --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash @@ -3032,21 +3032,6 @@ _git_stash () fi case "$subcommand,$cur" in - push,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_push - ;; - save,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_save - ;; - pop,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_pop - ;; - apply,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_apply - ;; - drop,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_drop - ;; list,--*) # NEEDSWORK: can we somehow unify this with the options in _git_log() and _git_show() __gitcomp_builtin stash_list "$__git_log_common_options $__git_diff_common_options" @@ -3054,8 +3039,8 @@ _git_stash () show,--*) __gitcomp_builtin stash_show "$__git_diff_common_options" ;; - branch,--*) - __gitcomp_builtin stash_branch + *,--*) + __gitcomp_builtin "stash_$subcommand" ;; branch,*) if [ $cword -eq $((__git_cmd_idx+2)) ]; then @@ -3069,8 +3054,6 @@ _git_stash () __gitcomp_nl "$(__git stash list \ | sed -n -e 's/:.*//p')" ;; - *) - ;; esac }
The $subcommand case statement in _git_stash() is quite repetitive. Consolidate the cases together into one catch-all case to reduce the repetition. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> --- contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 21 ++------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)