diff mbox series

[v2,03/16] t0000: replace test_must_fail with run_sub_test_lib_test_err()

Message ID 778ae9052bb75c4f574519027917a78d6d61596b.1576794144.git.liu.denton@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 1) | expand

Commit Message

Denton Liu Dec. 19, 2019, 10:22 p.m. UTC 
The test_must_fail function should only be used for git commands since
we should assume that external commands work sanely. We use
test_must_fail to test run_sub_test_lib_test() but that function does
not invoke any git commands internally. Even better, we have a function
that's exactly meant to be used when we expect to have a failing test
suite: run_sub_test_lib_test_err()!

Replace `test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test` with
`run_sub_test_lib_test_err`.

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
---
 t/t0000-basic.sh | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
index 8a81a249d0..3e440c078d 100755
--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@  test_expect_success 'pretend we have a fully passing test suite' "
 "
 
 test_expect_success 'pretend we have a partially passing test suite' "
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		partial-pass '2/3 tests passing' <<-\\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success 'passing test #1' 'true'
 	test_expect_success 'failing test #2' 'false'
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@  test_expect_success 'pretend we have fixed one of two known breakages (run in su
 "
 
 test_expect_success 'pretend we have a pass, fail, and known breakage' "
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		mixed-results1 'mixed results #1' <<-\\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true'
 	test_expect_success 'failing test' 'false'
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@  test_expect_success 'pretend we have a pass, fail, and known breakage' "
 "
 
 test_expect_success 'pretend we have a mix of all possible results' "
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		mixed-results2 'mixed results #2' <<-\\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true'
 	test_expect_success 'passing test' 'true'
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@  test_expect_success 'pretend we have a mix of all possible results' "
 "
 
 test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'test --verbose' '
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		t1234-verbose "test verbose" --verbose <<-\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success "passing test" true
 	test_expect_success "test with output" "echo foo"
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@  test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'test --verbose' '
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'test --verbose-only' '
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		t2345-verbose-only-2 "test verbose-only=2" \
 		--verbose-only=2 <<-\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success "passing test" true
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@  then
 fi
 
 test_expect_success 'tests clean up even on failures' "
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		failing-cleanup 'Failing tests with cleanup commands' <<-\\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success 'tests clean up even after a failure' '
 		touch clean-after-failure &&
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@  test_expect_success 'tests clean up even on failures' "
 "
 
 test_expect_success 'test_atexit is run' "
-	test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test \
+	run_sub_test_lib_test_err \
 		atexit-cleanup 'Run atexit commands' -i <<-\\EOF &&
 	test_expect_success 'tests clean up even after a failure' '
 		> ../../clean-atexit &&