@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void packet_response_end(int fd)
{
packet_trace("0002", 4, 1);
if (write_in_full(fd, "0002", 4) < 0)
- die_errno(_("unable to write stateless separator packet"));
+ die_errno(_("unable to write response end packet"));
}
int packet_flush_gently(int fd)
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int rpc_read_from_out(struct rpc_state *rpc, int options,
memcpy(buf - 4, "0000", 4);
break;
case PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END:
- die(_("remote server sent stateless separator"));
+ die(_("remote server sent unexpected response end packet"));
}
}
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int process_request(void)
state = PROCESS_REQUEST_DONE;
break;
case PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END:
- BUG("unexpected stateless separator packet");
+ BUG("unexpected response end packet");
}
}
In 0181b600a6 (pkt-line: define PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END, 2020-05-19), the Response End packet was defined for Git's network protocol. When the patch was sent, it included an oversight where the error messages referenced "stateless separator", the work-in-progress name, over "response end", the final name chosen. Correct these error messages by having them correctly reference a "response end" packet. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> --- pkt-line.c | 2 +- remote-curl.c | 2 +- serve.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)