@@ -3355,11 +3355,9 @@ static void read_packs_list_from_stdin(void)
for (p = get_all_packs(the_repository); p; p = p->next) {
const char *pack_name = pack_basename(p);
- item = string_list_lookup(&include_packs, pack_name);
- if (!item)
- item = string_list_lookup(&exclude_packs, pack_name);
-
- if (item)
+ if ((item = string_list_lookup(&include_packs, pack_name)))
+ item->util = p;
+ if ((item = string_list_lookup(&exclude_packs, pack_name)))
item->util = p;
}
@@ -169,4 +169,24 @@ test_expect_success 'pack-objects --stdin with duplicate packfile' '
)
'
+test_expect_success 'pack-objects --stdin with same packfile excluded and included' '
+ test_when_finished "rm -fr repo" &&
+
+ git init repo &&
+ (
+ cd repo &&
+ test_commit "commit" &&
+ git repack -ad &&
+
+ {
+ basename .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack &&
+ printf "^%s\n" "$(basename .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack)"
+ } >packfiles &&
+
+ git pack-objects --stdin-packs generated-pack <packfiles &&
+ packed_objects generated-pack-*.idx >packed-objects &&
+ test_must_be_empty packed-objects
+ )
+'
+
test_done
When passing the same packfile both as included and excluded via the `--stdin-packs` option, then we will return an error because the excluded packfile cannot be found. This is because we will only set the `util` pointer for the included packfile list if it was found, so that we later die when we notice that it's in fact not set for the excluded packfile list. Fix this bug by always setting the `util` pointer for both the included and excluded list entries. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> --- builtin/pack-objects.c | 8 +++----- t/t5331-pack-objects-stdin.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)