@@ -2255,6 +2255,8 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
if (cover_letter == -1) {
if (config_cover_letter == COVER_AUTO)
cover_letter = (total > 1);
+ else if ((idiff_prev.nr || rdiff_prev) && (total > 1))
+ cover_letter = (config_cover_letter != COVER_OFF);
else
cover_letter = (config_cover_letter == COVER_ON);
}
@@ -545,6 +545,20 @@ do
'
done
+test_expect_success "--range-diff implies --cover-letter for multi-patch series" '
+ test_when_finished "rm -f v2-000?-*" &&
+ git format-patch -v2 --range-diff=topic main..unmodified &&
+ test_grep "^Range-diff against v1:$" v2-0000-cover-letter.patch
+'
+
+test_expect_success "explicit --no-cover-letter defeats implied --cover-letter" '
+ test_when_finished "rm -f v2-000?-*" &&
+ test_must_fail git format-patch --no-cover-letter \
+ -v2 --range-diff=topic main..unmodified &&
+ test_must_fail git -c format.coverLetter=no format-patch \
+ -v2 --range-diff=topic main..unmodified
+'
+
test_expect_success 'format-patch --range-diff as commentary' '
git format-patch --range-diff=HEAD~1 HEAD~1 >actual &&
test_when_finished "rm 0001-*" &&
@@ -2445,6 +2445,21 @@ test_expect_success 'interdiff: solo-patch' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'interdiff: multi-patch, implicit --cover-letter' '
+ test_when_finished "rm -f v23-0*.patch" &&
+ git format-patch --interdiff=boop~2 -2 -v23 &&
+ test_grep "^Interdiff against v22:$" v23-0000-cover-letter.patch &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'interdiff: explicit --no-cover-letter defeats implied --cover-letter' '
+ test_when_finished "rm -f v23-0*.patch" &&
+ test_must_fail git format-patch --no-cover-letter \
+ --interdiff=boop~2 -2 -v23 &&
+ test_must_fail git -c format.coverLetter=no format-patch \
+ --interdiff=boop~2 -2 -v23
+'
+
test_expect_success 'format-patch does not respect diff.noprefix' '
git -c diff.noprefix format-patch -1 --stdout >actual &&
grep "^--- a/blorp" actual
When we deal with a multi-patch series in git-format-patch(1), if we see `--interdiff` or `--range-diff` but no `--cover-letter`, we return with an error, saying: fatal: --range-diff requires --cover-letter or single patch or: fatal: --interdiff requires --cover-letter or single patch This makes sense because the cover-letter is where we place the diff from the previous version. However, considering that `format-patch` generates a multi-patch as needed, let's adopt a similar "cover as necessary" approach when using `--interdiff` or `--range-diff`. Therefore, relax the requirement for an explicit `--cover-letter` in a multi-patch series when the user says `--iterdiff` or `--range-diff`. Still, if only to return the error, respect "format.coverLetter=no" and `--no-cover-letter`. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> --- builtin/log.c | 2 ++ t/t3206-range-diff.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++ t/t4014-format-patch.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)