@@ -2648,15 +2648,20 @@ static int update_submodule(struct update_data *update_data)
if (!update_data->nofetch) {
if (fetch_in_submodule(update_data->sm_path, update_data->depth,
- 0, NULL))
+ 0, NULL)) {
+ free(remote_ref);
return die_message(_("Unable to fetch in submodule path '%s'"),
update_data->sm_path);
+ }
}
if (repo_resolve_gitlink_ref(the_repository, update_data->sm_path,
- remote_ref, &update_data->oid))
- return die_message(_("Unable to find %s revision in submodule path '%s'"),
- remote_ref, update_data->sm_path);
+ remote_ref, &update_data->oid)) {
+ ret = die_message(_("Unable to find %s revision in submodule path '%s'"),
+ remote_ref, update_data->sm_path);
+ free(remote_ref);
+ return ret;
+ }
free(remote_ref);
}
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ as expected.
'
TEST_NO_CREATE_REPO=1
+TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'setup' '
When `update_submodule()` fails we return with `die_message()`, which only causes us to print the same message as `die()` would without actually causing the process to die. We don't free memory in that case and thus leak memory. Fix the leak by freeing the remote ref. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> --- builtin/submodule--helper.c | 13 +++++++++---- t/t7420-submodule-set-url.sh | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)