Message ID | petpdy3bs6wpfd3ilrg6xrjsbj5y7ql4geps6y22ozdqw7vi4k@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | grep: improve errors for unmatched ( and ) | expand |
Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> writes: > Imagine you want to grep for (. Easy: Please have a blank line before and > $ git grep '(' > fatal: unmatched parenthesis after a displayed text like this one (this applies to a few more paragraphs in the proposed log message). > uhoh. This is plainly wrong. Unless you know specifically that > (a) git grep has expression groups and that > (b) the only way to work around them is by doing -- '(' or -e '(' I do not think "--" (end of options and beginning of pathspec) marker would work for that purpose, UNLESS you are talking about a file whose name is an open parenthesis. Just keep "-e '('" in the description and drop the double-dash there. > Similarly, > $ git grep ')' > fatal: incomplete pattern expression: ) > is somehow worse. ")" is a complete regular expression pattern. > Of course, the error wants to say "group" here. Nice problem description so far. > These now return Phrase it more like "Make them return" ... > $ ./git grep '(' > fatal: unmatched ( for expression group > $ ./git grep ')' > fatal: incomplete pattern expression group: ) > which hopefully are clearer in indicating that it's not the expression > that's wrong (since no pattern had been parsed at all), but rather that > it's been misconstrued as a grouping operator. Nicely done. > Link: https://bugs.debian.org/1051205 > Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> > --- > grep.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/grep.c b/grep.c > index 5f23d1a..ac34bfe 100644 > --- a/grep.c > +++ b/grep.c > @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static struct grep_expr *compile_pattern_atom(struct grep_pat **list) > *list = p->next; > x = compile_pattern_or(list); > if (!*list || (*list)->token != GREP_CLOSE_PAREN) > - die("unmatched parenthesis"); > + die("unmatched ( for expression group"); > *list = (*list)->next; > return x; > default: > @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ void compile_grep_patterns(struct grep_opt *opt) > if (p) > opt->pattern_expression = compile_pattern_expr(&p); > if (p) > - die("incomplete pattern expression: %s", p->pattern); > + die("incomplete pattern expression group: %s", p->pattern); > > if (opt->no_body_match && opt->pattern_expression) > opt->pattern_expression = grep_not_expr(opt->pattern_expression); Thanks. The changes to these two messages look good.
diff --git a/grep.c b/grep.c index 5f23d1a..ac34bfe 100644 --- a/grep.c +++ b/grep.c @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static struct grep_expr *compile_pattern_atom(struct grep_pat **list) *list = p->next; x = compile_pattern_or(list); if (!*list || (*list)->token != GREP_CLOSE_PAREN) - die("unmatched parenthesis"); + die("unmatched ( for expression group"); *list = (*list)->next; return x; default: @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ void compile_grep_patterns(struct grep_opt *opt) if (p) opt->pattern_expression = compile_pattern_expr(&p); if (p) - die("incomplete pattern expression: %s", p->pattern); + die("incomplete pattern expression group: %s", p->pattern); if (opt->no_body_match && opt->pattern_expression) opt->pattern_expression = grep_not_expr(opt->pattern_expression);
Imagine you want to grep for (. Easy: $ git grep '(' fatal: unmatched parenthesis uhoh. This is plainly wrong. Unless you know specifically that (a) git grep has expression groups and that (b) the only way to work around them is by doing -- '(' or -e '(' Similarly, $ git grep ')' fatal: incomplete pattern expression: ) is somehow worse. ")" is a complete regular expression pattern. Of course, the error wants to say "group" here. In this case it's also not "incomplete", it's unmatched. But whatever. These now return $ ./git grep '(' fatal: unmatched ( for expression group $ ./git grep ')' fatal: incomplete pattern expression group: ) which hopefully are clearer in indicating that it's not the expression that's wrong (since no pattern had been parsed at all), but rather that it's been misconstrued as a grouping operator. Link: https://bugs.debian.org/1051205 Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> --- grep.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)