| Message ID | 20250205145757.889247-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | dmaengine: dma_request_chan*() amendments | expand |
On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:57:08 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Reduce the scope of the use of some rarely used DMA request channel APIs > in order to make the step of their removal or making static in the > future. No functional changes intended. > > In v3: > - rebased on top of v6.14-rc1 > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] dmaengine: Replace dma_request_slave_channel() by dma_request_chan() commit: 31d43141d13aa63587f140884b1f667800ce4e1d [2/4] dmaengine: Use dma_request_channel() instead of __dma_request_channel() commit: 1c83d3dfa0905590408595560629627cba4f9261 [3/4] dmaengine: Add a comment on why it's okay when kasprintf() fails commit: 1722fb4a1307748f983c1345c4c24178d8e0be47 [4/4] dmaengine: Unify checks in dma_request_chan() commit: 91d8560c15918c7d44e4f665fac829ba8057a2f3 Best regards,
Reduce the scope of the use of some rarely used DMA request channel APIs in order to make the step of their removal or making static in the future. No functional changes intended. In v3: - rebased on top of v6.14-rc1 In v2: - updated the commit messages (Frank) Andy Shevchenko (4): dmaengine: Replace dma_request_slave_channel() by dma_request_chan() dmaengine: Use dma_request_channel() instead of __dma_request_channel() dmaengine: Add a comment on why it's okay when kasprintf() fails dmaengine: Unify checks in dma_request_chan() drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 16 ++++++++-------- drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 ++--- include/linux/dmaengine.h | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)