Message ID | 20220818230243.3921066-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/i915: HuC loading for DG2 | expand |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:02:28PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > Note that this series includes several mei patches that add support for > sending the HuC loading command via mei-gsc. These patches depend on the > GSC support for DG2 [1], which has been included squashed in a single > patch to make the series apply and allow CI to run. We plan to merge > those patches through the drm tree because i915 is the sole user. Doesn't look like you cc:ed me on any of the mei patches, which is odd, and ensure I can't review them :( And why are mei changes needed only for drm? thanks, greg k-h
On 8/19/2022 12:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:02:28PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: >> Note that this series includes several mei patches that add support for >> sending the HuC loading command via mei-gsc. These patches depend on the >> GSC support for DG2 [1], which has been included squashed in a single >> patch to make the series apply and allow CI to run. We plan to merge >> those patches through the drm tree because i915 is the sole user. > Doesn't look like you cc:ed me on any of the mei patches, which is odd, > and ensure I can't review them :( My bad, will re-send the series and properly CC you on the mei patches. > And why are mei changes needed only for drm? Simplifying a bit here: the GSC is on the discrete graphics card and only performs operations that are related to it; we have the mei driver take control of the GSC because its interface is mostly the same as the ME, so we can re-use the flows that are already implemented in mei with some tweaks. Daniele > thanks, > > greg k-h