| Message ID | 20230419060036.3422635-1-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() | expand |
Hi Tejas, On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:30:33AM +0530, Tejas Upadhyay wrote: > drm/i915/gt: drm/i915/gem: drm/i915/selftests: > Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() > > In order to enable complete multi-GT, use the GT > reference obtained directly from the engine, rather > than relying on the to_gt(), which only provides a > reference to the primary GT. > > Problem appear when it runs on platform like MTL > where different set of engines are possible on > different GTs. > > Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com> pushed to drm-intel-gt-next. Thank you! Andi
drm/i915/gt: drm/i915/gem: drm/i915/selftests: Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() In order to enable complete multi-GT, use the GT reference obtained directly from the engine, rather than relying on the to_gt(), which only provides a reference to the primary GT. Problem appear when it runs on platform like MTL where different set of engines are possible on different GTs. Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com> Tejas Upadhyay (3): drm/i915/gt: Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() drm/i915/gem: Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() drm/i915/selftests: Consider multi-gt instead of to_gt() .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 2 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_live_test.c | 46 +++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)