Message ID | 20240318103534.701693-7-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | lib/kunit: Execute test cases synchronously | expand |
-----Original Message----- From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 3:13 AM To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>; Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v3 0/5] lib/kunit: Execute test cases synchronously > > Up to now we were loading a KUnit test module in test execution mode only > once per subtest, in background, and then, in parallel with execution of > test cases while the module was loading, we were looking through dmesg for > KTAP results from each expected test case. As a consequence, our IGT > messages were more or less delayed, never in full sync with kernel > messages. Moreover, parsing of KTAP results from already completed test > cases could be abandoned on a failure from loading the test module or > kernel taint caused by a subsequent test case. Also, parsing of KTAP > results from all subsequent test cases could be abandoned on a failure of > the parser caused by any test case. Other than that, if a user requested > a single dynamic sub-subtest, all test cases were executed anyway while > results from only one of them that corresponded to the selected dynamic > sub-subtest were reported. That way, kernel messages from unrelated test > cases, not only the selected one, could contribute to dmesg-fail or dmesg- > warn CI results from that sub-subtest. > > Since recent KUnit implementation is capable of executing only those test > cases that match a user filter, stop executing all of them asynchronously > and parsing their KTAP results as they appear. Instead, reload the test > module once per each dynamic sub-subtest with a filter that selects a > specific test case and wait for its completion. If successful and no > kernel taint has occurred then parse the whole KTAP report from a single > test case it has produced and translate it to IGT result of that single > corresponding sub-subtest. > > v3: Insert new patches 1-3 that fix an infinite loop when we try to get a > list of test cases from an unexpectedly missing KTAP report. > v2: Refresh the series on top of changes to KUnit filters handling, > - move the code of a new helper from a previous patch 1 to a previous > patch 2 which now becomes patch 1, > - actually limit the scope of the helper to fetching a KTAP report from > a file descriptor, and let the callers decide on how other steps, like > setting up filters or loading a test module, and errors they return > are handled, > - update commit description with a more detailed justification of why we > need these changes, > - rebase the former patch 1 on top of the new patch 1, update its commit > message and description and provide it as patch 2. > > Janusz Krzysztofik (5): > lib/kunit: Store igt_ktap_results pointer in a central location > lib/kunit: Let igt_ktap_free() take care of pointer reset > lib/kunit: Time out promptly on missing KTAP report > lib/kunit: Execute test cases synchronously > lib/kunit: Minimize code duplication > Acked-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> Ack applies to all patches in series. It seems that Kamil is giving a proper review to all the individual patches, so I'd wait until that's done before moving forward. -Jonathan Cavitt > lib/igt_kmod.c | 193 ++++++++++++++---------------------- > lib/igt_ktap.c | 5 +- > lib/igt_ktap.h | 2 +- > lib/tests/igt_ktap_parser.c | 24 ++--- > 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 > >