Message ID | 1389973873-2005-5-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:51:13PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> > > ... and QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE is not present. > > I initially thought that case was impossible and just added a WARN on > it, but then I was told this case is possible due to > QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE. So let's add a WARN that serves two purposes: > - tell us in case we have done something wrong; > - document the only case where we expect this. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 9f356f9..e2df886 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -1791,8 +1791,11 @@ static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc) reg = PIPECONF(cpu_transcoder); val = I915_READ(reg); - if (val & PIPECONF_ENABLE) + if (val & PIPECONF_ENABLE) { + WARN_ON(!(pipe == PIPE_A && + dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE)); return; + } I915_WRITE(reg, val | PIPECONF_ENABLE); POSTING_READ(reg);