diff mbox

[6/6] drm/i915: get runtime PM at intel_set_mode

Message ID 1394233524-3522-7-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Paulo Zanoni March 7, 2014, 11:05 p.m. UTC
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Otherwise, when we run intel_modeset_check_state we may already be
runtime suspended, and our state checking code will read registers
while the device is suspended. This can only happen if your
autosuspend_delay_ms is low (not the default 10s) and i915.pc8_timeout
is set to zero.

NOTE: The correct way to fix this problem would be to properly get/put
runtime PM at the get_config/state functions. I still didn't do this,
so I'll keep this patch on the series because it fixes the remaining
WARNs we get while running the pm_pc8 test suite. It's fine if we
don't merge this. The problem

v2: - Add the note above.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Daniel Vetter March 8, 2014, 10:04 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:05:24PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> Otherwise, when we run intel_modeset_check_state we may already be
> runtime suspended, and our state checking code will read registers
> while the device is suspended. This can only happen if your
> autosuspend_delay_ms is low (not the default 10s) and i915.pc8_timeout
> is set to zero.
> 
> NOTE: The correct way to fix this problem would be to properly get/put
> runtime PM at the get_config/state functions. I still didn't do this,
> so I'll keep this patch on the series because it fixes the remaining
> WARNs we get while running the pm_pc8 test suite. It's fine if we
> don't merge this. The problem

Imre has added a bunch more power well enabling checks ... do we still
have gaps in our coverage?

If it's not a terrible lot of them I'd prefer we properly close those
instead of this little hack here. So still not too happy to merge this ;-)
-Daniel

> 
> v2: - Add the note above.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 0868afb..dc2b377 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9785,13 +9785,18 @@ static int intel_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  			  struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>  			  int x, int y, struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
>  {
> +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +
>  	ret = __intel_set_mode(crtc, mode, x, y, fb);
>  
>  	if (ret == 0)
>  		intel_modeset_check_state(crtc->dev);
>  
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Imre Deak March 10, 2014, 4:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 11:04 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:05:24PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > 
> > Otherwise, when we run intel_modeset_check_state we may already be
> > runtime suspended, and our state checking code will read registers
> > while the device is suspended. This can only happen if your
> > autosuspend_delay_ms is low (not the default 10s) and i915.pc8_timeout
> > is set to zero.
> > 
> > NOTE: The correct way to fix this problem would be to properly get/put
> > runtime PM at the get_config/state functions. I still didn't do this,
> > so I'll keep this patch on the series because it fixes the remaining
> > WARNs we get while running the pm_pc8 test suite. It's fine if we
> > don't merge this. The problem
> 
> Imre has added a bunch more power well enabling checks ... do we still
> have gaps in our coverage?

We still need Paulo's "[PATCH 03/16] drm/i915: get/put runtime PM when
we get/put a power domain", but after that we don't need the extra
intel_runtime_pm_get/put calls here.

> If it's not a terrible lot of them I'd prefer we properly close those
> instead of this little hack here. So still not too happy to merge this ;-)
> -Daniel
> 
> > 
> > v2: - Add the note above.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 0868afb..dc2b377 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -9785,13 +9785,18 @@ static int intel_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >  			  struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> >  			  int x, int y, struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
> >  {
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> > +
> >  	ret = __intel_set_mode(crtc, mode, x, y, fb);
> >  
> >  	if (ret == 0)
> >  		intel_modeset_check_state(crtc->dev);
> >  
> > +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.8.5.3
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 0868afb..dc2b377 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -9785,13 +9785,18 @@  static int intel_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 			  struct drm_display_mode *mode,
 			  int x, int y, struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
 {
+	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	int ret;
 
+	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
+
 	ret = __intel_set_mode(crtc, mode, x, y, fb);
 
 	if (ret == 0)
 		intel_modeset_check_state(crtc->dev);
 
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 	return ret;
 }