From patchwork Tue Apr 29 21:52:36 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ben Widawsky X-Patchwork-Id: 4089371 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C353EBFF02 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B32620200 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58F020222 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D273F8A463; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F108A47C for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2014 14:47:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,953,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="531947091" Received: from ironside.jf.intel.com ([10.7.197.221]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2014 14:52:48 -0700 From: Ben Widawsky To: Intel GFX Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:52:36 -0700 Message-Id: <1398808360-3674-10-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.2 In-Reply-To: <1398808360-3674-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> References: <1398808360-3674-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP As Ville points out, it's possible/probable we don't actually need this. Potentially, this validates the letter of the spec, and not the spirit. Ville: > I discussed this on irc w/ Ben, and I was suggesting we don't need to > poll. Polling apparently can be used as a workaround for certain > hardware issues, but it looks like those issues shouldn't affect us, > for the momemnt at least. So my suggestion was to try w/o polling > first (since there could be some power cost to polling) and add the > poll bit if problems arise. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 31b1f3c..e7748ef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ gen8_ring_sync(struct intel_ring_buffer *waiter, intel_ring_emit(waiter, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT | MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT | + MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL | MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD); intel_ring_emit(waiter, seqno); intel_ring_emit(waiter,