Message ID | 1410823310-5465-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:21:50PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > In some cases like when PSR just got enabled the panel need more vblank > times to calculate CRC. I figured that out with the new PSR test cases > facing some cases that I had a green screen but a blank CRC. Even with > 2 vblank waits on kernel + 2 vblank waits on test case. > > So let's give up to 6 vblank wait time. However we now check for > TEST_CRC_COUNT that shows when panel finished to calculate CRC and > has it ready. > > v2: Jani pointed out attempts decrements was wrong and should never reach > the error condition. And Daniel pointed out that EIO is more appropriated than > EGAIN. Also I realized that I have to read test_crc_count after setting > test_sink > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 5 +++-- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index f79473b..fae0fae 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -3468,21 +3468,30 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *crc) > struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev; > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = > to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc); > - u8 buf[1]; > + u8 buf; > + int test_crc_count; > + int attempts = 6; > > - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, buf) < 0) > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf) < 0) > return -EAGAIN; > > - if (!(buf[0] & DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED)) > + if (!(buf & DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED)) > return -ENOTTY; > > if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK, > DP_TEST_SINK_START) < 0) > return -EAGAIN; > > - /* Wait 2 vblanks to be sure we will have the correct CRC value */ > - intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); > - intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); > + drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf); > + test_crc_count = buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK; > + > + do { > + drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf); > + intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); > + } while (--attempts && (buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK) == test_crc_count); > + > + if (attempts == 0) > + return -EIO; I still think that some debug output here would be useful - after all we've seen this happen now with your panel, so it could happen at other places too. If there's nothing else I'll do that when applying. -Daniel > > if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_CRC_R_CR, crc, 6) < 0) > return -EAGAIN; > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h > index 9305c71..8edeed0 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h > @@ -303,7 +303,8 @@ > #define DP_TEST_CRC_B_CB 0x244 > > #define DP_TEST_SINK_MISC 0x246 > -#define DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED (1 << 5) > +# define DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED (1 << 5) > +# define DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK 0x7 > > #define DP_TEST_RESPONSE 0x260 > # define DP_TEST_ACK (1 << 0) > @@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ > #define DP_TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM 0x261 > > #define DP_TEST_SINK 0x270 > -#define DP_TEST_SINK_START (1 << 0) > +# define DP_TEST_SINK_START (1 << 0) > > #define DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS 0x2c0 /* 1.2 MST */ > # define DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATED (1 << 0) > -- > 1.9.3 >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index f79473b..fae0fae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -3468,21 +3468,30 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *crc) struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev; struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc); - u8 buf[1]; + u8 buf; + int test_crc_count; + int attempts = 6; - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, buf) < 0) + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf) < 0) return -EAGAIN; - if (!(buf[0] & DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED)) + if (!(buf & DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED)) return -ENOTTY; if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK, DP_TEST_SINK_START) < 0) return -EAGAIN; - /* Wait 2 vblanks to be sure we will have the correct CRC value */ - intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); - intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); + drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf); + test_crc_count = buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK; + + do { + drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_SINK_MISC, &buf); + intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe); + } while (--attempts && (buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK) == test_crc_count); + + if (attempts == 0) + return -EIO; if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_CRC_R_CR, crc, 6) < 0) return -EAGAIN; diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h index 9305c71..8edeed0 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h @@ -303,7 +303,8 @@ #define DP_TEST_CRC_B_CB 0x244 #define DP_TEST_SINK_MISC 0x246 -#define DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED (1 << 5) +# define DP_TEST_CRC_SUPPORTED (1 << 5) +# define DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK 0x7 #define DP_TEST_RESPONSE 0x260 # define DP_TEST_ACK (1 << 0) @@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ #define DP_TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM 0x261 #define DP_TEST_SINK 0x270 -#define DP_TEST_SINK_START (1 << 0) +# define DP_TEST_SINK_START (1 << 0) #define DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS 0x2c0 /* 1.2 MST */ # define DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATED (1 << 0)
In some cases like when PSR just got enabled the panel need more vblank times to calculate CRC. I figured that out with the new PSR test cases facing some cases that I had a green screen but a blank CRC. Even with 2 vblank waits on kernel + 2 vblank waits on test case. So let's give up to 6 vblank wait time. However we now check for TEST_CRC_COUNT that shows when panel finished to calculate CRC and has it ready. v2: Jani pointed out attempts decrements was wrong and should never reach the error condition. And Daniel pointed out that EIO is more appropriated than EGAIN. Also I realized that I have to read test_crc_count after setting test_sink Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)