diff mbox

[2/2] drm/i915: only run hsw_power_well_post_enable when really needed

Message ID 1412709071-1886-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Paulo Zanoni Oct. 7, 2014, 7:11 p.m. UTC
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Only run it after we actually enable the power well. When we're
booting the machine there are cases where we run
hsw_power_well_post_enable without really needing, and even though
this is not causing any real bugs, it is unneeded and causes confusion
to people debugging interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ville Syrjälä Oct. 7, 2014, 8 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:11:11PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> Only run it after we actually enable the power well. When we're
> booting the machine there are cases where we run
> hsw_power_well_post_enable without really needing, and even though
> this is not causing any real bugs, it is unneeded and causes confusion
> to people debugging interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Seems perfectly sensible.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 36749b9..39c33e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			if (wait_for((I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER) &
>  				      HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE_ENABLED), 20))
>  				DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n");
> +			hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
>  		}
>  
> -		hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
>  	} else {
>  		if (enable_requested) {
>  			I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0);
> -- 
> 2.1.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Daniel Vetter Oct. 22, 2014, 6:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:00:54PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:11:11PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > 
> > Only run it after we actually enable the power well. When we're
> > booting the machine there are cases where we run
> > hsw_power_well_post_enable without really needing, and even though
> > this is not causing any real bugs, it is unneeded and causes confusion
> > to people debugging interrupts.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> 
> Seems perfectly sensible.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 36749b9..39c33e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -221,9 +221,9 @@  static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			if (wait_for((I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER) &
 				      HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE_ENABLED), 20))
 				DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n");
+			hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
 		}
 
-		hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
 	} else {
 		if (enable_requested) {
 			I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0);