@@ -356,9 +356,9 @@ static int execlists_ctx_write_tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj, u32 tai
return 0;
}
-static int execlists_submit_context(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
- struct intel_context *to0, u32 tail0,
- struct intel_context *to1, u32 tail1)
+static void execlists_submit_contexts(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
+ struct intel_context *to0, u32 tail0,
+ struct intel_context *to1, u32 tail1)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj0;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj1 = NULL;
@@ -378,8 +378,6 @@ static int execlists_submit_context(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
}
execlists_elsp_write(ring, ctx_obj0, ctx_obj1);
-
- return 0;
}
static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
@@ -413,9 +411,9 @@ static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
WARN_ON(req1 && req1->elsp_submitted);
- WARN_ON(execlists_submit_context(ring, req0->ctx, req0->tail,
- req1 ? req1->ctx : NULL,
- req1 ? req1->tail : 0));
+ execlists_submit_contexts(ring, req0->ctx, req0->tail,
+ req1 ? req1->ctx : NULL,
+ req1 ? req1->tail : 0);
req0->elsp_submitted++;
if (req1)
execlists_submit_context() always returns 0, which is redundant. And its name is inaccurate, since it actually submits (up to) TWO contextS. So we rename it, change it to "void", and remove the WARN_ON() testing its return value. Change-Id: Ie225b0eca7754c6093c8b8bd15550b251b6feb82 Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)