From patchwork Thu Nov 13 17:51:52 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Lespiau, Damien" X-Patchwork-Id: 5299611 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EE2C11AC for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0AB201E4 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E748200CC for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963A46EBDA; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:52:04 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAEA6EBEF for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2014 09:49:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,379,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="607379222" Received: from rkeeling-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO strange.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.12.195]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2014 09:52:02 -0800 From: Damien Lespiau To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:51:52 +0000 Message-Id: <1415901112-7233-8-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1415901112-7233-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> References: <1415901112-7233-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Let's hope future platforms will use the same WM code as SKL X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Given the history, there's some chance we'll keep the same WM code for a bit (previously, we were able to reuse the same WM code from ILK to BDW, so that sounds like a fair assumption). Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com) --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 0c705d9..87bff16 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -7067,7 +7067,7 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev) i915_ironlake_get_mem_freq(dev); /* For FIFO watermark updates */ - if (IS_GEN9(dev)) { + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) { skl_setup_wm_latency(dev); dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating = gen9_init_clock_gating;