Message ID | 1423234598-14781-7-git-send-email-akash.goel@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:26:37PM +0530, akash.goel@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> > > Added support for SKL in the 'i915_frequency_info' debugfs function > > Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 9af17fb..32c62a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > seq_printf(m, "Current P-state: %d\n", > (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT); > } else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) || > - IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { > + IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_GEN9(dev)) { Can we be optimistic by default (and hope next platform will be no extra work by having a INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)? > u32 gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS); > u32 rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS); > u32 rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); > @@ -1109,8 +1109,12 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > reqf = I915_READ(GEN6_RPNSWREQ); > reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; > + if (!IS_GEN9(dev)) > + reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; It seems like you to remove one masking of bit 31? (can we have >= 9 as well?). Maybe a simpler way to go about it would be: if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) reqf >>= 23; else { reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) reqf >>= 24; else reqf >>= 25; } > if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > reqf >>= 24; > + else if IS_GEN9(dev) > + reqf >>= 23; > else > reqf >>= 25; > reqf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, reqf); > @@ -1128,6 +1132,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > rpprevdown = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_PREV_DOWN); > if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > cagf = (rpstat & HSW_CAGF_MASK) >> HSW_CAGF_SHIFT; > + else if (IS_GEN9(dev)) > + cagf = (rpstat & GEN9_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT; > else > cagf = (rpstat & GEN6_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT; cagf (as well as reqf) is(are) used in a printf saying they are Mhz. That looks wrong. > cagf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, cagf); > @@ -1152,7 +1158,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask); > seq_printf(m, "GT_PERF_STATUS: 0x%08x\n", gt_perf_status); > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state ratio: %d\n", > - (gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8); > + (gt_perf_status & (IS_GEN9(dev) ? 0x1ff00 : 0xff00)) >> 8); Eeek, that's a weird name to say freq. Here the 16.66 unit strikes back, can we have at least a comment? > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state VID: %d\n", > gt_perf_status & 0xff); > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state limit: %d\n", > -- > 1.9.2 >
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 15:38 +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:26:37PM +0530, akash.goel@intel.com wrote: > > From: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> > > > > Added support for SKL in the 'i915_frequency_info' debugfs function > > > > Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > index 9af17fb..32c62a2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > seq_printf(m, "Current P-state: %d\n", > > (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT); > > } else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) || > > - IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { > > + IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_GEN9(dev)) { > > Can we be optimistic by default (and hope next platform will be no extra > work by having a INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)? Sorry I am not sure.. If it turns out, that there is no extra work required for future platforms, then at that time we can do >= 9 change. > > > u32 gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS); > > u32 rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS); > > u32 rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); > > @@ -1109,8 +1109,12 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > > > reqf = I915_READ(GEN6_RPNSWREQ); > > reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; > > + if (!IS_GEN9(dev)) > > + reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; > > It seems like you to remove one masking of bit 31? (can we have >= 9 as > well?). > > Maybe a simpler way to go about it would be: Thanks for spotting this, will modify it as per your suggestion. > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) > reqf >>= 23; > else { > reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; > if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > reqf >>= 24; > else > reqf >>= 25; > } > > > if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > > reqf >>= 24; > > + else if IS_GEN9(dev) > > + reqf >>= 23; > > else > > reqf >>= 25; > > reqf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, reqf); > > @@ -1128,6 +1132,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > rpprevdown = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_PREV_DOWN); > > if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > > cagf = (rpstat & HSW_CAGF_MASK) >> HSW_CAGF_SHIFT; > > + else if (IS_GEN9(dev)) > > + cagf = (rpstat & GEN9_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT; > > else > > cagf = (rpstat & GEN6_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT; > > cagf (as well as reqf) is(are) used in a printf saying they are Mhz. That looks > wrong. There is a conversion done below, before the printf, through "cagf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, cagf)" So should be alright then ? But not able to find the precise info, that frequency specified in 0xA01C register, is in which units for GEN9. For the reqf, there is a conversion missing from 16.667 MHZ units, for GEN9. Will add that. > > > cagf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, cagf); > > @@ -1152,7 +1158,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask); > > seq_printf(m, "GT_PERF_STATUS: 0x%08x\n", gt_perf_status); > > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state ratio: %d\n", > > - (gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8); > > + (gt_perf_status & (IS_GEN9(dev) ? 0x1ff00 : 0xff00)) >> 8); > > Eeek, that's a weird name to say freq. Here the 16.66 unit strikes back, can we > have at least a comment? Sorry didn't get this point. Just printing the raw value of P State ratio (Un-Slice) in GT_PERF_STATUS register. > > > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state VID: %d\n", > > gt_perf_status & 0xff); > > seq_printf(m, "Render p-state limit: %d\n", > > -- > > 1.9.2 > > Best Regards Akash
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 9af17fb..32c62a2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) seq_printf(m, "Current P-state: %d\n", (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT); } else if (IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) || - IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { + IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_GEN9(dev)) { u32 gt_perf_status = I915_READ(GEN6_GT_PERF_STATUS); u32 rp_state_limits = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS); u32 rp_state_cap = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); @@ -1109,8 +1109,12 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) reqf = I915_READ(GEN6_RPNSWREQ); reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; + if (!IS_GEN9(dev)) + reqf &= ~GEN6_TURBO_DISABLE; if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) reqf >>= 24; + else if IS_GEN9(dev) + reqf >>= 23; else reqf >>= 25; reqf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, reqf); @@ -1128,6 +1132,8 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) rpprevdown = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_PREV_DOWN); if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) cagf = (rpstat & HSW_CAGF_MASK) >> HSW_CAGF_SHIFT; + else if (IS_GEN9(dev)) + cagf = (rpstat & GEN9_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT; else cagf = (rpstat & GEN6_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT; cagf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, cagf); @@ -1152,7 +1158,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask); seq_printf(m, "GT_PERF_STATUS: 0x%08x\n", gt_perf_status); seq_printf(m, "Render p-state ratio: %d\n", - (gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8); + (gt_perf_status & (IS_GEN9(dev) ? 0x1ff00 : 0xff00)) >> 8); seq_printf(m, "Render p-state VID: %d\n", gt_perf_status & 0xff); seq_printf(m, "Render p-state limit: %d\n",