From patchwork Wed Apr 15 13:07:11 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mika Kahola X-Patchwork-Id: 6220551 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-intel-gfx@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A9F9F1C4 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EB5201BC for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D881A200FF for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CD56E850; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 06:09:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6609C6E850 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 06:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2015 06:07:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,582,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="714047241" Received: from sorvi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.165]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2015 06:07:52 -0700 From: Mika Kahola To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:07:11 +0300 Message-Id: <1429103244-3515-2-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1429103244-3515-1-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com> References: <1429103244-3515-1-git-send-email-mika.kahola@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Fix i855 get_display_clock_speed X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Actually read the HPLLCC register insted of assuming it's 0. Fix the HPLLCC bit definitions and all the missing ones from the 852GME spec. 852GME, 854 and 855 all seem to match the same HPLLC encoding even though only some of the values are valid is some of the platforms. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 077cb90..441bf38 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -50,12 +50,17 @@ /* PCI config space */ -#define HPLLCC 0xc0 /* 855 only */ -#define GC_CLOCK_CONTROL_MASK (0xf << 0) +#define HPLLCC 0xc0 /* 85x only */ +#define GC_CLOCK_CONTROL_MASK (0x7 << 0) #define GC_CLOCK_133_200 (0 << 0) #define GC_CLOCK_100_200 (1 << 0) #define GC_CLOCK_100_133 (2 << 0) -#define GC_CLOCK_166_250 (3 << 0) +#define GC_CLOCK_133_266 (3 << 0) +#define GC_CLOCK_133_200_2 (4 << 0) +#define GC_CLOCK_133_266_2 (5 << 0) +#define GC_CLOCK_166_266 (6 << 0) +#define GC_CLOCK_166_250 (7 << 0) + #define GCFGC2 0xda #define GCFGC 0xf0 /* 915+ only */ #define GC_LOW_FREQUENCY_ENABLE (1 << 7) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 75afa6e..71123c7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -6301,20 +6301,29 @@ static int i865_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev) return 266667; } -static int i855_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev) +static int i85x_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev) { u16 hpllcc = 0; + + pci_bus_read_config_word(dev->pdev->bus, + PCI_DEVFN(0, 3), HPLLCC, &hpllcc); + /* Assume that the hardware is in the high speed state. This * should be the default. */ switch (hpllcc & GC_CLOCK_CONTROL_MASK) { case GC_CLOCK_133_200: + case GC_CLOCK_133_200_2: case GC_CLOCK_100_200: return 200000; case GC_CLOCK_166_250: return 250000; case GC_CLOCK_100_133: return 133333; + case GC_CLOCK_133_266: + case GC_CLOCK_133_266_2: + case GC_CLOCK_166_266: + return 266667; } /* Shouldn't happen */ @@ -13986,8 +13995,8 @@ static void intel_init_display(struct drm_device *dev) i865_get_display_clock_speed; else if (IS_I85X(dev)) dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed = - i855_get_display_clock_speed; - else /* 852, 830 */ + i85x_get_display_clock_speed; + else /* 830 */ dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed = i830_get_display_clock_speed;