Message ID | 1446496428-12135-3-git-send-email-rafael.antognolli@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:33:48PM -0800, Rafael Antognolli wrote: > So far, the i915 driver and some other drivers set it to the drm_device, > which doesn't allow one to know which DP a given aux channel is related > to. Changing this to be the drm_connector provides proper nesting, still > allowing one to get the drm_device from it. Some drivers already set it > to the drm_connector. > > This also removes the need to add a sysfs link for the i2c device under > the connector, as it will already be there. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@intel.com> I gave aux_dev a bit of a testing here, and it appaers to work quite splendidly. This patch however causes lots of WARN spew if I unload the driver while in middle of dumping the DPCD via the aux_dev. It appears we we clean up things the wrong order now. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 19 ++----------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index 8287df4..7aacc08 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -1078,36 +1078,21 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_connector *connector) > intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = intel_dp->output_reg + 0x10; > > intel_dp->aux.name = name; > - intel_dp->aux.dev = dev->dev; > + intel_dp->aux.dev = connector->base.kdev; > intel_dp->aux.transfer = intel_dp_aux_transfer; > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("registering %s bus for %s\n", name, > connector->base.kdev->kobj.name); > > ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux); > - if (ret < 0) { > + if (ret < 0) > DRM_ERROR("drm_dp_aux_register() for %s failed (%d)\n", > name, ret); > - return; > - } > - > - ret = sysfs_create_link(&connector->base.kdev->kobj, > - &intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj, > - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); > - if (ret < 0) { > - DRM_ERROR("sysfs_create_link() for %s failed (%d)\n", name, ret); > - drm_dp_aux_unregister(&intel_dp->aux); > - } > } > > static void > intel_dp_connector_unregister(struct intel_connector *intel_connector) > { > - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(&intel_connector->base); > - > - if (!intel_connector->mst_port) > - sysfs_remove_link(&intel_connector->base.kdev->kobj, > - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); > intel_connector_unregister(intel_connector); > } > > -- > 2.4.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31:41PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:33:48PM -0800, Rafael Antognolli wrote: > > So far, the i915 driver and some other drivers set it to the drm_device, > > which doesn't allow one to know which DP a given aux channel is related > > to. Changing this to be the drm_connector provides proper nesting, still > > allowing one to get the drm_device from it. Some drivers already set it > > to the drm_connector. > > > > This also removes the need to add a sysfs link for the i2c device under > > the connector, as it will already be there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@intel.com> > > I gave aux_dev a bit of a testing here, and it appaers to work quite > splendidly. > > This patch however causes lots of WARN spew if I unload the driver > while in middle of dumping the DPCD via the aux_dev. It appears we > we clean up things the wrong order now. It looks like device_destroy is being called twice on the drm_aux_dev and i2c adapter devices. If I understood correctly, this is happening because I changed the parent device, from the drm_device to the drm_connector, but the drm_connector is being destroyed before the drm_aux_dev and i2c adapter devices, which already causes them to be destroyed too. Changing the drm_dp_aux_unregister() from inside intel_dp_aux_fini() to intel_dp_connector_unregister(), right before intel_connector_unregister(), seems to fix everything, and it still makes sense in my opinion, since the auxdev is going to be unregistered before we destroy the drm_connector. Do you think that would be ok? > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 19 ++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > index 8287df4..7aacc08 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > @@ -1078,36 +1078,21 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_connector *connector) > > intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = intel_dp->output_reg + 0x10; > > > > intel_dp->aux.name = name; > > - intel_dp->aux.dev = dev->dev; > > + intel_dp->aux.dev = connector->base.kdev; > > intel_dp->aux.transfer = intel_dp_aux_transfer; > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("registering %s bus for %s\n", name, > > connector->base.kdev->kobj.name); > > > > ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux); > > - if (ret < 0) { > > + if (ret < 0) > > DRM_ERROR("drm_dp_aux_register() for %s failed (%d)\n", > > name, ret); > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - ret = sysfs_create_link(&connector->base.kdev->kobj, > > - &intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj, > > - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); > > - if (ret < 0) { > > - DRM_ERROR("sysfs_create_link() for %s failed (%d)\n", name, ret); > > - drm_dp_aux_unregister(&intel_dp->aux); > > - } > > } > > > > static void > > intel_dp_connector_unregister(struct intel_connector *intel_connector) > > { > > - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(&intel_connector->base); > > - > > - if (!intel_connector->mst_port) > > - sysfs_remove_link(&intel_connector->base.kdev->kobj, > > - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); > > intel_connector_unregister(intel_connector); > > } > > > > -- > > 2.4.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index 8287df4..7aacc08 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -1078,36 +1078,21 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_connector *connector) intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = intel_dp->output_reg + 0x10; intel_dp->aux.name = name; - intel_dp->aux.dev = dev->dev; + intel_dp->aux.dev = connector->base.kdev; intel_dp->aux.transfer = intel_dp_aux_transfer; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("registering %s bus for %s\n", name, connector->base.kdev->kobj.name); ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux); - if (ret < 0) { + if (ret < 0) DRM_ERROR("drm_dp_aux_register() for %s failed (%d)\n", name, ret); - return; - } - - ret = sysfs_create_link(&connector->base.kdev->kobj, - &intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj, - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); - if (ret < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("sysfs_create_link() for %s failed (%d)\n", name, ret); - drm_dp_aux_unregister(&intel_dp->aux); - } } static void intel_dp_connector_unregister(struct intel_connector *intel_connector) { - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(&intel_connector->base); - - if (!intel_connector->mst_port) - sysfs_remove_link(&intel_connector->base.kdev->kobj, - intel_dp->aux.ddc.dev.kobj.name); intel_connector_unregister(intel_connector); }
So far, the i915 driver and some other drivers set it to the drm_device, which doesn't allow one to know which DP a given aux channel is related to. Changing this to be the drm_connector provides proper nesting, still allowing one to get the drm_device from it. Some drivers already set it to the drm_connector. This also removes the need to add a sysfs link for the i2c device under the connector, as it will already be there. Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 19 ++----------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)