Message ID | 1460107954-13740-4-git-send-email-matthew.auld@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:32:32AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Much like with the equivalent gen8_alloc_va_range.
Just delete the warn and make the allocation paths stronger if you feel
paranoid.
-Chris
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c index 180dbd8..5589a8d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c @@ -1857,7 +1857,8 @@ static int gen6_alloc_va_range(struct i915_address_space *vm, uint32_t pde, temp; int ret; - if (WARN_ON(start_in + length_in > ppgtt->base.total)) + if (WARN_ON(start_in > ppgtt->base.total || length_in > + ppgtt->base.total - start_in)) return -ENODEV; start = start_save = start_in;
Much like with the equivalent gen8_alloc_va_range. Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)