@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static void gen8_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = i915_vm_to_ggtt(vm);
struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
gen8_pte_t __iomem *gtt_entries;
- gen8_pte_t gtt_entry;
+ gen8_pte_t gtt_entry = I915_NULL_PTE;
dma_addr_t addr;
int rpm_atomic_seq;
int i = 0;
@@ -2389,8 +2389,10 @@ static void gen8_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
* of NUMA access patterns. Therefore, even with the way we assume
* hardware should work, we must keep this posting read for paranoia.
*/
- if (i != 0)
- WARN_ON(readq(>t_entries[i-1]) != gtt_entry);
+ if (i != 0) {
+ gen8_pte_t last_gtt_entry = readq(>t_entries[i-1]);
+ WARN_ON(last_gtt_entry != gtt_entry);
+ }
/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
* want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
@@ -2465,7 +2467,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = i915_vm_to_ggtt(vm);
struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
gen6_pte_t __iomem *gtt_entries;
- gen6_pte_t gtt_entry;
+ gen6_pte_t gtt_entry = I915_NULL_PTE;
dma_addr_t addr;
int rpm_atomic_seq;
int i = 0;
@@ -2479,14 +2481,17 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
iowrite32(gtt_entry, >t_entries[i++]);
}
- /* XXX: This serves as a posting read to make sure that the PTE has
+ /*
+ * XXX: This serves as a posting read to make sure that the PTE has
* actually been updated. There is some concern that even though
* registers and PTEs are within the same BAR that they are potentially
* of NUMA access patterns. Therefore, even with the way we assume
* hardware should work, we must keep this posting read for paranoia.
*/
- if (i != 0)
- WARN_ON(readl(>t_entries[i-1]) != gtt_entry);
+ if (i != 0) {
+ gen8_pte_t last_gtt_entry = readl(>t_entries[i-1]);
+ WARN_ON(last_gtt_entry != gtt_entry);
+ }
/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
* want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ typedef uint64_t gen8_ppgtt_pml4e_t;
#define GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED (1 << 1)
#define GEN6_PTE_VALID (1 << 0)
+#define I915_NULL_PTE 0
#define I915_PTES(pte_len) (PAGE_SIZE / (pte_len))
#define I915_PTE_MASK(pte_len) (I915_PTES(pte_len) - 1)
#define I915_PDES 512
gcc is getting false positives in its detection of uninitialised values. Specifically it thinks 'gtt_entry' can be used in a WARN_ON() macro without previously being assigned (the assigment is inside a conditional loop), bu actually the WARN_ON() can only be reached if the assignment has also been executed at least once. To avoid the annoying warning, though, this patch reorganises the code a little and adds an explicit initialisation of the suspect variable. Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)