From patchwork Wed Sep 14 00:38:16 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Zanoni, Paulo R" X-Patchwork-Id: 9330145 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4035260231 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BF4297FD for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 25C472982B; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:39:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6A4297FD for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059E06E600; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:38:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AB36E5FE for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2016 17:38:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.30,331,1470726000"; d="scan'208"; a="1055592253" Received: from przanoni-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.180.219]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2016 17:38:37 -0700 From: Paulo Zanoni To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:38:16 -0300 Message-Id: <1473813502-16844-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1473813502-16844-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> References: <1473813502-16844-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which means SKL and KBL, but not BXT. I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it. v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 5b2eb7a..1968672 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2887,8 +2887,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane *plane) static bool intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && - dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; + if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) + return true; + + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && + dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED) + return true; + + return false; } /* @@ -2926,7 +2932,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (ret == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; @@ -2980,7 +2986,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (result == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0;