From patchwork Thu Sep 22 21:00:30 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Zanoni, Paulo R" X-Patchwork-Id: 9346941 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F5860757 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85C12ABDE for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BD5292AC59; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783062ABDE for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560D06E97C; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4EF6E979 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2016 14:00:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.30,379,1470726000"; d="scan'208"; a="1060677501" Received: from przanoni-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.185.162]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2016 14:00:48 -0700 From: Paulo Zanoni To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:00:30 -0300 Message-Id: <1474578035-424-5-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1474578035-424-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> References: <1474578035-424-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vandana Kannan Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/gen9: fix the WaWmMemoryReadLatency implementation X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Bspec says: "The mailbox response data may not account for memory read latency. If the mailbox response data for level 0 is 0us, add 2 microseconds to the result for each valid level." This means we should only do the +2 in case wm[0] == 0, not always. So split the sanitizing implementation from the WA implementation and fix the WA implementation. v2: Add Fixes tag (Maarten). Fixes: 367294be7c25 ("drm/i915/gen9: Add 2us read latency to WM level") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vandana Kannan Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index f09d912..ee561c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2127,32 +2127,34 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8]) GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_MASK; /* + * If a level n (n > 1) has a 0us latency, all levels m (m >= n) + * need to be disabled. We make sure to sanitize the values out + * of the punit to satisfy this requirement. + */ + for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) { + if (wm[level] == 0) { + for (i = level + 1; i <= max_level; i++) + wm[i] = 0; + break; + } + } + + /* * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl * * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need - * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from - * the punit. - * - W0 is a bit special in that it's the only level that - * can't be disabled if we want to have display working, so - * we always add 2us there. - * - For levels >=1, punit returns 0us latency when they are - * disabled, so we respect that and don't add 2us then - * - * Additionally, if a level n (n > 1) has a 0us latency, all - * levels m (m >= n) need to be disabled. We make sure to - * sanitize the values out of the punit to satisfy this - * requirement. + * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the + * punit when level 0 response data us 0us. */ - wm[0] += 2; - for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) - if (wm[level] != 0) + if (wm[0] == 0) { + wm[0] += 2; + for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) { + if (wm[level] == 0) + break; wm[level] += 2; - else { - for (i = level + 1; i <= max_level; i++) - wm[i] = 0; - - break; } + } + } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);