From patchwork Wed Jun 7 04:51:17 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Srinivas, Vidya" X-Patchwork-Id: 9770527 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C517760364 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B277F28389 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A703828512; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE5228389 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913196E1C3; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EBA6E1C2 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2017 21:44:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,309,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="95424935" Received: from vsrini4-ubuntu-intel.iind.intel.com ([10.223.25.59]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2017 21:44:14 -0700 From: Vidya Srinivas To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:21:17 +0530 Message-Id: <1496811086-28706-3-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1496811086-28706-1-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> References: <1496811086-28706-1-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Fix scaling check for 90/270 degree plane rotation X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Ville Syrjälä Starting from commit b63a16f6cd89 ("drm/i915: Compute display surface offset in the plane check hook for SKL+") we've already rotated the src coordinates by 270 degrees by the time we check if a scaler is needed or not, so we must not account for the rotation a second time. Previously we did these steps in the opposite order and hence the scaler check had to deal with rotation itself. The double rotation handling causes us to enable a scaler pretty much every time 90/270 degree plane rotation is requested, leading to fuzzier fonts and whatnot. v2: s/unsigned/unsigned int/ to appease checkpatch Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/147690/ Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Fixes: b63a16f6cd89 ("drm/i915: Compute display surface offset in the plane check hook for SKL+") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 035d702..9f30b95 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -4769,7 +4769,7 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe) static int skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach, - unsigned scaler_user, int *scaler_id, unsigned int rotation, + unsigned int scaler_user, int *scaler_id, int src_w, int src_h, int dst_w, int dst_h) { struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state = @@ -4778,9 +4778,12 @@ static void cpt_verify_modeset(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe) to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc); int need_scaling; - need_scaling = drm_rotation_90_or_270(rotation) ? - (src_h != dst_w || src_w != dst_h): - (src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h); + /* + * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for + * the 90/270 degree plane rotation cases (to match the + * GTT mapping), hence no need to account for rotation here. + */ + need_scaling = src_w != dst_w || src_h != dst_h; /* * if plane is being disabled or scaler is no more required or force detach @@ -4842,7 +4845,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *state) const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &state->base.adjusted_mode; return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active, SKL_CRTC_INDEX, - &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0, + &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h, adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay); } @@ -4871,7 +4874,6 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, ret = skl_update_scaler(crtc_state, force_detach, drm_plane_index(&intel_plane->base), &plane_state->scaler_id, - plane_state->base.rotation, drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16, drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16, drm_rect_width(&plane_state->base.dst),