Message ID | 1505820782-14587-1-git-send-email-petri.latvala@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 09/19/2017 02:33 PM, Petri Latvala wrote: > Multiple misunderstandings of the expectations of the test and some > missed parts of the shell-to-c conversion caused a couple of issues to > remain. > > First, we need to actually disable a subbank before we check that a > subbank is disabled (invoke the tool with -d). > > Second, the original pipe to wc -l was to check that the tool prints > only one line, not that it prints "at least" a line. Modify the last > check to verify that an "is disabled" text is _not_ printed. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101650 > CC: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> > --- > tests/tools_test.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/tools_test.c b/tests/tools_test.c > index 132bb88b..ed32bb29 100644 > --- a/tests/tools_test.c > +++ b/tests/tools_test.c > @@ -28,26 +28,31 @@ > #include <fcntl.h> > > struct line_check { > - bool found; > + int found; > const char *substr; > }; > > /** > * Our igt_log_buffer_inspect handler. Checks the output of the > - * intel_l3_parity tool and returns line_check::found to true if > - * a specific substring is found. > + * intel_l3_parity tool and increments line_check::found if a specific > + * substring is found. > */ > -static bool check_cmd_return_value(const char *line, void *data) > +static bool check_cmd_output(const char *line, void *data) > { > struct line_check *check = data; > > - if (!strstr(line, check->substr)) { > - check->found = false; > - return false; > + if (strstr(line, check->substr)) { > + check->found++; > } > > - check->found = true; > - return true; > + return false; > +} > + > +static void assert_cmd_success(int exec_return) > +{ > + igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, > + "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); > + igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); > } > > igt_main > @@ -56,46 +61,50 @@ igt_main > > igt_subtest("sysfs_l3_parity") { > int exec_return; > + struct line_check line; > > + /* Sanity check that l3 parity tool is usable: Enable > + * row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. > + */ > igt_system_cmd(exec_return, > "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " > "-s 0 -e"); > - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, > - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); > - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); > + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); > > + /* Disable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. */ > + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " > + "-s 0 -d"); > + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); > + > + /* Check that disabling was successful */ > igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); > - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) { > - struct line_check line; > - line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; > - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value, > - &line); > - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true); > - } > + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); > + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; > + line.found = 0; > + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output, > + &line); > + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1); > > + /* Re-enable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0 */ > igt_system_cmd(exec_return, > "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " > "-s 0 -e"); > - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, > - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); > - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); > + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); > > - /* Check that we can clear remaps: > - * In the original shell script, the output of intel_l3_parity -l > - * was piped thru wc -l to check if the tool would at least > - * return a line. Just watch for one of the expected output > - * string as an alternative. > - * ("is disabled" unique only to intel_l3_parity.c:dumpit()) > + /* Check that re-enabling was successful: > + * intel_l3_parity -l should now not print that Row 0, > + * Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled. > + * > + * The previously printed line is already in the log > + * buffer so we check for count 1. > */ > - igt_system_cmd(exec_return, > - "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); > - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) { > - struct line_check line; > - line.substr = "is disabled"; > - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value, > - &line); > - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true); > - } > + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); > + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); > + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; > + line.found = 0; > + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output, > + &line); > + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1); > } > > igt_subtest("tools_test") { >
diff --git a/tests/tools_test.c b/tests/tools_test.c index 132bb88b..ed32bb29 100644 --- a/tests/tools_test.c +++ b/tests/tools_test.c @@ -28,26 +28,31 @@ #include <fcntl.h> struct line_check { - bool found; + int found; const char *substr; }; /** * Our igt_log_buffer_inspect handler. Checks the output of the - * intel_l3_parity tool and returns line_check::found to true if - * a specific substring is found. + * intel_l3_parity tool and increments line_check::found if a specific + * substring is found. */ -static bool check_cmd_return_value(const char *line, void *data) +static bool check_cmd_output(const char *line, void *data) { struct line_check *check = data; - if (!strstr(line, check->substr)) { - check->found = false; - return false; + if (strstr(line, check->substr)) { + check->found++; } - check->found = true; - return true; + return false; +} + +static void assert_cmd_success(int exec_return) +{ + igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, + "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); + igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); } igt_main @@ -56,46 +61,50 @@ igt_main igt_subtest("sysfs_l3_parity") { int exec_return; + struct line_check line; + /* Sanity check that l3 parity tool is usable: Enable + * row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. + */ igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " "-s 0 -e"); - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); + /* Disable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. */ + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " + "-s 0 -d"); + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); + + /* Check that disabling was successful */ igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) { - struct line_check line; - line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value, - &line); - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true); - } + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; + line.found = 0; + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output, + &line); + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1); + /* Re-enable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0 */ igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 " "-s 0 -e"); - igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP, - "intel_l3_parity not supported\n"); - igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS); + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); - /* Check that we can clear remaps: - * In the original shell script, the output of intel_l3_parity -l - * was piped thru wc -l to check if the tool would at least - * return a line. Just watch for one of the expected output - * string as an alternative. - * ("is disabled" unique only to intel_l3_parity.c:dumpit()) + /* Check that re-enabling was successful: + * intel_l3_parity -l should now not print that Row 0, + * Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled. + * + * The previously printed line is already in the log + * buffer so we check for count 1. */ - igt_system_cmd(exec_return, - "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); - if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) { - struct line_check line; - line.substr = "is disabled"; - igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value, - &line); - igt_assert_eq(line.found, true); - } + igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l"); + assert_cmd_success(exec_return); + line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled"; + line.found = 0; + igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output, + &line); + igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1); } igt_subtest("tools_test") {
Multiple misunderstandings of the expectations of the test and some missed parts of the shell-to-c conversion caused a couple of issues to remain. First, we need to actually disable a subbank before we check that a subbank is disabled (invoke the tool with -d). Second, the original pipe to wc -l was to check that the tool prints only one line, not that it prints "at least" a line. Modify the last check to verify that an "is disabled" text is _not_ printed. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101650 CC: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> --- tests/tools_test.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)