diff mbox

[v2,1/1] drm/i915: Split i915_gem_suspend into user quiescing and HW cleanup/suspend

Message ID 1507271849-28467-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 6, 2017, 6:37 a.m. UTC
GTT mappings are to be suspended post i915_gem_suspend and display
suspend. GPU is reset in i915_gem_suspend. This separated the HW suspend
across reset. To achieve the complete HW cleanup prior to GPU reset we
need to separate i915_gem_suspend functionality into user quiescing
and HW cleanup. With this patch new function i915_gem_quiescent is created
that will ensure GEM is idle. i915_gem_suspend will ensure all GPU HW
operations are suspended.

With this patch drm suspend sequence is gem_quiescent followed by
gem_suspend. Unload sequence is gem_quiescent->gem_fini->gem_suspend.
This unload sequence ensures GuC HW access to destroy client in gem_fini
succeeds.

v2. Split i915_gem_suspend to accomodate GTT mappings suspend as that is
not to be done till display suspend. (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 10 ++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 6, 2017, 8:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/6/2017 12:07 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> GTT mappings are to be suspended post i915_gem_suspend and display
I think I should say this "post idling GPU and display suspend". Will 
update in next rev.
> suspend. GPU is reset in i915_gem_suspend. This separated the HW suspend
> across reset. To achieve the complete HW cleanup prior to GPU reset we
> need to separate i915_gem_suspend functionality into user quiescing
> and HW cleanup. With this patch new function i915_gem_quiescent
And this should have been named "i915_gem_quiesce"?
Chris, Joonas, does i915_gem_quiesce  for user quiescing and 
i915_gem_suspend for HW suspend look good?
>   is created
> that will ensure GEM is idle. i915_gem_suspend will ensure all GPU HW
> operations are suspended.
>
> With this patch drm suspend sequence is gem_quiescent followed by
> gem_suspend. Unload sequence is gem_quiescent->gem_fini->gem_suspend.
> This unload sequence ensures GuC HW access to destroy client in gem_fini
> succeeds.
>
> v2. Split i915_gem_suspend to accomodate GTT mappings suspend as that is
> not to be done till display suspend. (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 10 ++++++----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 ++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 66fc156..875ce94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -693,9 +693,10 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   
>   cleanup_gem:
> -	if (i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv))
> +	if (i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv))
>   		DRM_ERROR("failed to idle hardware; continuing to unload!\n");
>   	i915_gem_fini(dev_priv);
> +	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
>   cleanup_uc:
>   	intel_uc_fini_fw(dev_priv);
>   cleanup_irq:
> @@ -1395,7 +1396,7 @@ void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>   
>   	i915_driver_unregister(dev_priv);
>   
> -	if (i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv))
> +	if (i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv))
>   		DRM_ERROR("failed to idle hardware; continuing to unload!\n");
>   
>   	intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> @@ -1430,6 +1431,7 @@ void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	i915_reset_error_state(dev_priv);
>   
>   	i915_gem_fini(dev_priv);
> +	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
>   	intel_uc_fini_fw(dev_priv);
>   	intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
>   
> @@ -1540,7 +1542,7 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>   
>   	pci_save_state(pdev);
>   
> -	error = i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
> +	error = i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv);
>   	if (error) {
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>   			"GEM idle failed, resume might fail\n");
> @@ -1558,7 +1560,7 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>   
>   	intel_suspend_hw(dev_priv);
>   
> -	i915_gem_suspend_gtt_mappings(dev_priv);
> +	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
>   
>   	i915_save_state(dev_priv);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 1fc7080..982e37e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3688,7 +3688,8 @@ void i915_gem_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   void i915_gem_cleanup_engines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   			   unsigned int flags);
> -int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +int __must_check i915_gem_quiescent(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf);
>   int i915_gem_object_wait(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index ab8c694..d5ca218 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -4507,13 +4507,12 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +int i915_gem_quiescent(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   {
>   	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> -	intel_suspend_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   
> @@ -4539,8 +4538,6 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   	i915_gem_contexts_lost(dev_priv);
>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   
> -	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
> -
>   	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work);
>   	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gt.retire_work);
>   
> @@ -4557,6 +4554,29 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   	if (WARN_ON(!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv)))
>   		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
>   
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> +	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> +
> +	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +	intel_suspend_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> +	i915_gem_suspend_gtt_mappings(dev_priv);
> +
> +	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
>   	 * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
> @@ -4578,13 +4598,9 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   	 */
>   	i915_gem_sanitize(dev_priv);
>   
> -	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> -	return 0;
> -
> -err_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
>   	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> -	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
Joonas Lahtinen Oct. 12, 2017, 9:13 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 13:39 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> 
> On 10/6/2017 12:07 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > GTT mappings are to be suspended post i915_gem_suspend and display
> 
> I think I should say this "post idling GPU and display suspend". Will 
> update in next rev.
> > suspend. GPU is reset in i915_gem_suspend. This separated the HW suspend
> > across reset. To achieve the complete HW cleanup prior to GPU reset we
> > need to separate i915_gem_suspend functionality into user quiescing
> > and HW cleanup. With this patch new function i915_gem_quiescent
> 
> And this should have been named "i915_gem_quiesce"?
> Chris, Joonas, does i915_gem_quiesce  for user quiescing and 
> i915_gem_suspend for HW suspend look good?

The BAT results seemed quite negative.

Regards, Joonas
sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 12, 2017, 9:18 a.m. UTC | #3
On 10/12/2017 2:43 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 13:39 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>> On 10/6/2017 12:07 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>>> GTT mappings are to be suspended post i915_gem_suspend and display
>> I think I should say this "post idling GPU and display suspend". Will
>> update in next rev.
>>> suspend. GPU is reset in i915_gem_suspend. This separated the HW suspend
>>> across reset. To achieve the complete HW cleanup prior to GPU reset we
>>> need to separate i915_gem_suspend functionality into user quiescing
>>> and HW cleanup. With this patch new function i915_gem_quiescent
>> And this should have been named "i915_gem_quiesce"?
>> Chris, Joonas, does i915_gem_quiesce  for user quiescing and
>> i915_gem_suspend for HW suspend look good?
> The BAT results seemed quite negative.
Yes. Addressed as part of GEM/GuC fixes series.
>
> Regards, Joonas
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 66fc156..875ce94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -693,9 +693,10 @@  static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 	return 0;
 
 cleanup_gem:
-	if (i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv))
+	if (i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv))
 		DRM_ERROR("failed to idle hardware; continuing to unload!\n");
 	i915_gem_fini(dev_priv);
+	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
 cleanup_uc:
 	intel_uc_fini_fw(dev_priv);
 cleanup_irq:
@@ -1395,7 +1396,7 @@  void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	i915_driver_unregister(dev_priv);
 
-	if (i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv))
+	if (i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv))
 		DRM_ERROR("failed to idle hardware; continuing to unload!\n");
 
 	intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
@@ -1430,6 +1431,7 @@  void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 	i915_reset_error_state(dev_priv);
 
 	i915_gem_fini(dev_priv);
+	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
 	intel_uc_fini_fw(dev_priv);
 	intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
 
@@ -1540,7 +1542,7 @@  static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	pci_save_state(pdev);
 
-	error = i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
+	error = i915_gem_quiescent(dev_priv);
 	if (error) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 			"GEM idle failed, resume might fail\n");
@@ -1558,7 +1560,7 @@  static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	intel_suspend_hw(dev_priv);
 
-	i915_gem_suspend_gtt_mappings(dev_priv);
+	i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv);
 
 	i915_save_state(dev_priv);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1fc7080..982e37e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3688,7 +3688,8 @@  void i915_gem_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 void i915_gem_cleanup_engines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			   unsigned int flags);
-int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int __must_check i915_gem_quiescent(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf);
 int i915_gem_object_wait(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index ab8c694..d5ca218 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4507,13 +4507,12 @@  void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	}
 }
 
-int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+int i915_gem_quiescent(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
 	int ret;
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
-	intel_suspend_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
@@ -4539,8 +4538,6 @@  int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	i915_gem_contexts_lost(dev_priv);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
-	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
-
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->gt.retire_work);
 
@@ -4557,6 +4554,29 @@  int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	if (WARN_ON(!intel_engines_are_idle(dev_priv)))
 		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
 
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+	return 0;
+
+err_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
+
+	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
+	intel_suspend_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
+
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
+	i915_gem_suspend_gtt_mappings(dev_priv);
+
+	intel_guc_suspend(dev_priv);
+
 	/*
 	 * Neither the BIOS, ourselves or any other kernel
 	 * expects the system to be in execlists mode on startup,
@@ -4578,13 +4598,9 @@  int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 */
 	i915_gem_sanitize(dev_priv);
 
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
-	return 0;
-
-err_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)