diff mbox

[v13,09/21] drm/i915/uc: Create uC suspend and resume functions

Message ID 1507712056-25030-10-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 11, 2017, 8:54 a.m. UTC
Prepared generic helpers intel_uc_suspend, intel_uc_resume. These are
called from respective GEM functions. Only exception is intel_uc_resume
that needs to be called w/ or w/o GuC loaded in i915_drm_resume path.
Changes to add WOPCM condition check to load GuC during resume will be
added in later patches.

v2: Rebase w.r.t removal of GuC code restructuring.

v3: Calling intel_uc_resume from i915_gem_resume post resuming
i915 gem setup. This is symmetrical with i915_gem_suspend.
Removed error messages from i915 suspend/resume routines as
uC suspend/resume routines will have those. (Michal Wajdeczko)
Declare wedged on uc_suspend failure and uc_resume failure.
(Michał Winiarski)
Keeping the uC suspend/resume function definitions close to other
uC functions.

v4: Added implementation to intel_uc_resume as GuC resume is
needed to be triggered post reloading the firmware as well. Added
comments about semantics of GuC resume with the firmware reload.

v5: Updated return from i915_gem_runtime_suspend. Moved the comment
about GuC reload optimization to intel_uc_init_hw. (Michal Wajdeczko)
Updated comments as FIXME.

v6: Kept error handling for failure from i915_gem_runtime_suspend only.
We don't want GEM/GuC resume failure to impact intel_runtime_resume or
i915_drm_resume. GEM suspend failure along i915_drm_suspend can also
be ignored as we reset GPU post that. Updated comments. (Chris, Joonas)

v7: Removed intel_uc_resume from i915_drm_resume as it will be done as
part of intel_uc_init_hw in further patches. Removed TODO comments about
handling GuC load skip on resume. This is to be addressed in further
patches. Added error return from intel_uc_suspend as we plan to add
functionality to resume submission in case of suspend failure in further
patches. Removed runtime uC suspend/resume functions as functionality
will be similar in both paths.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Michal Wajdeczko Oct. 11, 2017, 3:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:54:04 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble  
<sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:

> Prepared generic helpers intel_uc_suspend, intel_uc_resume. These are
> called from respective GEM functions. Only exception is intel_uc_resume
> that needs to be called w/ or w/o GuC loaded in i915_drm_resume path.
> Changes to add WOPCM condition check to load GuC during resume will be
> added in later patches.
>
> v2: Rebase w.r.t removal of GuC code restructuring.
>
> v3: Calling intel_uc_resume from i915_gem_resume post resuming
> i915 gem setup. This is symmetrical with i915_gem_suspend.
> Removed error messages from i915 suspend/resume routines as
> uC suspend/resume routines will have those. (Michal Wajdeczko)
> Declare wedged on uc_suspend failure and uc_resume failure.
> (Michał Winiarski)
> Keeping the uC suspend/resume function definitions close to other
> uC functions.
>
> v4: Added implementation to intel_uc_resume as GuC resume is
> needed to be triggered post reloading the firmware as well. Added
> comments about semantics of GuC resume with the firmware reload.
>
> v5: Updated return from i915_gem_runtime_suspend. Moved the comment
> about GuC reload optimization to intel_uc_init_hw. (Michal Wajdeczko)
> Updated comments as FIXME.
>
> v6: Kept error handling for failure from i915_gem_runtime_suspend only.
> We don't want GEM/GuC resume failure to impact intel_runtime_resume or
> i915_drm_resume. GEM suspend failure along i915_drm_suspend can also
> be ignored as we reset GPU post that. Updated comments. (Chris, Joonas)
>
> v7: Removed intel_uc_resume from i915_drm_resume as it will be done as
> part of intel_uc_init_hw in further patches. Removed TODO comments about
> handling GuC load skip on resume. This is to be addressed in further
> patches. Added error return from intel_uc_suspend as we plan to add
> functionality to resume submission in case of suspend failure in further
> patches. Removed runtime uC suspend/resume functions as functionality
> will be similar in both paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 38447ae..7d1b7e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2056,11 +2056,13 @@ static void  
> __i915_gem_object_release_mmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
> -	int i;
> +	int i, ret;
> 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
> -	intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> 	/*
>  	 * Only called during RPM suspend. All users of the userfault_list
> @@ -2098,9 +2100,10 @@ int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct  
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		reg->dirty = true;
>  	}
> +out_unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
> void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -2110,7 +2113,7 @@ void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct  
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
>  	i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
> -	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
> 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>  }
> @@ -4681,7 +4684,9 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
> 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_unlock;
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> 	/*
> @@ -4730,7 +4735,7 @@ void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	 */
>  	dev_priv->gt.resume(dev_priv);
> -	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
> 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 7305486..b5c132c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -283,3 +283,19 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
>  		i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
>  }
> +
> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		DRM_ERROR("Failed to suspend GuC\n");
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
> +}

Can we add kerneldoc for above new functions?
With doc added

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index e18d3bb..e20bc72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -34,5 +34,7 @@
>  void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> #endif
sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 12, 2017, 6:25 a.m. UTC | #2
On 10/11/2017 9:27 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:54:04 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble 
> <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Prepared generic helpers intel_uc_suspend, intel_uc_resume. These are
>> called from respective GEM functions. Only exception is intel_uc_resume
>> that needs to be called w/ or w/o GuC loaded in i915_drm_resume path.
>> Changes to add WOPCM condition check to load GuC during resume will be
>> added in later patches.
>>
>> v2: Rebase w.r.t removal of GuC code restructuring.
>>
>> v3: Calling intel_uc_resume from i915_gem_resume post resuming
>> i915 gem setup. This is symmetrical with i915_gem_suspend.
>> Removed error messages from i915 suspend/resume routines as
>> uC suspend/resume routines will have those. (Michal Wajdeczko)
>> Declare wedged on uc_suspend failure and uc_resume failure.
>> (Michał Winiarski)
>> Keeping the uC suspend/resume function definitions close to other
>> uC functions.
>>
>> v4: Added implementation to intel_uc_resume as GuC resume is
>> needed to be triggered post reloading the firmware as well. Added
>> comments about semantics of GuC resume with the firmware reload.
>>
>> v5: Updated return from i915_gem_runtime_suspend. Moved the comment
>> about GuC reload optimization to intel_uc_init_hw. (Michal Wajdeczko)
>> Updated comments as FIXME.
>>
>> v6: Kept error handling for failure from i915_gem_runtime_suspend only.
>> We don't want GEM/GuC resume failure to impact intel_runtime_resume or
>> i915_drm_resume. GEM suspend failure along i915_drm_suspend can also
>> be ignored as we reset GPU post that. Updated comments. (Chris, Joonas)
>>
>> v7: Removed intel_uc_resume from i915_drm_resume as it will be done as
>> part of intel_uc_init_hw in further patches. Removed TODO comments about
>> handling GuC load skip on resume. This is to be addressed in further
>> patches. Added error return from intel_uc_suspend as we plan to add
>> functionality to resume submission in case of suspend failure in further
>> patches. Removed runtime uC suspend/resume functions as functionality
>> will be similar in both paths.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h |  2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index 38447ae..7d1b7e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -2056,11 +2056,13 @@ static void 
>> __i915_gem_object_release_mmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>>  int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>>      struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
>> -    int i;
>> +    int i, ret;
>>     mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>> -    intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +    ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto out_unlock;
>>     /*
>>       * Only called during RPM suspend. All users of the userfault_list
>> @@ -2098,9 +2100,10 @@ int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>          reg->dirty = true;
>>      }
>> +out_unlock:
>>      mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>> -    return 0;
>> +    return ret;
>>  }
>> void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> @@ -2110,7 +2113,7 @@ void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>      i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
>>      i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
>> -    intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +    intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
>>     mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>>  }
>> @@ -4681,7 +4684,9 @@ int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *dev_priv)
>>          i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard 
>> everything */
>>     mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>> -    intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +    ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto err_unlock;
>>      mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>>     /*
>> @@ -4730,7 +4735,7 @@ void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *dev_priv)
>>       */
>>      dev_priv->gt.resume(dev_priv);
>> -    intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +    intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
>>     mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> index 7305486..b5c132c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -283,3 +283,19 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *dev_priv)
>>      if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
>>          i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
>>  }
>> +
>> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        DRM_ERROR("Failed to suspend GuC\n");
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +    intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
>> +}
>
> Can we add kerneldoc for above new functions?
> With doc added
Since full flow was established in the later patches hence deferred doc 
addition.
Will add partially here. Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> index e18d3bb..e20bc72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> @@ -34,5 +34,7 @@
>>  void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> #endif
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 38447ae..7d1b7e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2056,11 +2056,13 @@  static void __i915_gem_object_release_mmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
-	int i;
+	int i, ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
-	intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
+	ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/*
 	 * Only called during RPM suspend. All users of the userfault_list
@@ -2098,9 +2100,10 @@  int i915_gem_runtime_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		reg->dirty = true;
 	}
 
+out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -2110,7 +2113,7 @@  void i915_gem_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
 	i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
 
-	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
+	intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 }
@@ -4681,7 +4684,9 @@  int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		i915_gem_set_wedged(dev_priv); /* no hope, discard everything */
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
+	ret = intel_uc_suspend(dev_priv);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_unlock;
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
 	/*
@@ -4730,7 +4735,7 @@  void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 */
 	dev_priv->gt.resume(dev_priv);
 
-	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
+	intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 7305486..b5c132c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -283,3 +283,19 @@  void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading)
 		i915_ggtt_disable_guc(dev_priv);
 }
+
+int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = intel_guc_suspend(&dev_priv->guc);
+	if (ret)
+		DRM_ERROR("Failed to suspend GuC\n");
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	intel_guc_resume(&dev_priv->guc);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
index e18d3bb..e20bc72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
@@ -34,5 +34,7 @@ 
 void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 
 #endif