From patchwork Thu Mar 1 01:01:38 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jackie Li X-Patchwork-Id: 10250235 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4605760211 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C8B28825 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2D27628E6E; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:04:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9B528825 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B626EBC1; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:03:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EE16EBC0 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 01:03:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2018 17:03:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,406,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="30538795" Received: from yli84-z170x-ud5.fm.intel.com ([10.19.83.14]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2018 17:03:53 -0800 From: Jackie Li To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:01:38 -0800 Message-Id: <1519866100-19989-4-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1519866100-19989-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> References: <1519866100-19989-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 4/6] drm/i915: Add HuC firmware size related restriction for Gen9 and CNL A0 X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On CNL A0 and Gen9, there's a hardware restriction that requires the available GuC WOPCM size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size. This patch adds new verification code to ensure the available GuC WOPCM size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size on both Gen9 and CNL A0. v6: - Extended HuC FW size check against GuC WOPCM size to all Gen9 and CNL A0 platforms v7: - Fixed patch format issues v8: - Renamed variables and functions to avoid ambiguity (Joonas) - Updated commit message and comments to be more comprehensive (Sagar) v9: - Moved code that is not related to restriction check into a separate patch and updated the commit message accordingly (Sagar/Michal) - Avoided to call uc_get_fw_size for better layer isolation (Michal) v10: - Shorten function names and reorganized size_check code to have clear isolation (Joonas) - Removed unnecessary comments (Joonas) v11: - Fixed logic error in size check (Michal) BSpec: 10875 Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: John Spotswood Cc: Jeff McGee Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble (v8) Signed-off-by: Jackie Li Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c index bb78043..b30d7ff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c @@ -107,8 +107,26 @@ static inline int gen9_check_dword_gap(u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size) return 0; } +static inline int gen9_check_huc_fw_fits(u32 guc_wopcm_size, u32 huc_fw_size) +{ + /* + * On Gen9 & CNL A0, hardware requires the total available GuC WOPCM + * size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size. Otherwise, + * firmware uploading would fail. + */ + if (huc_fw_size > guc_wopcm_size - GUC_WOPCM_RESERVED) { + DRM_ERROR("HuC fw(%uKiB) won't fit in GuC WOPCM(%uKiB).\n", + huc_fw_size / 1024, + (guc_wopcm_size - GUC_WOPCM_RESERVED) / 1024); + return -E2BIG; + } + + return 0; +} + static inline int check_hw_restriction(struct drm_i915_private *i915, - u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size) + u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size, + u32 huc_fw_size) { int err = 0; @@ -117,7 +135,10 @@ static inline int check_hw_restriction(struct drm_i915_private *i915, if (err) return err; - return 0; + if (IS_GEN9(i915) || IS_CNL_REVID(i915, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_A0)) + err = gen9_check_huc_fw_fits(guc_wopcm_size, huc_fw_size); + + return err; } /** @@ -186,7 +207,8 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) return -E2BIG; } - err = check_hw_restriction(i915, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size); + err = check_hw_restriction(i915, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size, + huc_fw_size); if (err) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to meet HW restriction.\n"); return err;