From patchwork Fri Mar 2 00:16:44 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jackie Li X-Patchwork-Id: 10252927 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0505602B5 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01B328734 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C4FF32873E; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B00728734 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B976EDE5; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195D56EDE1 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:19:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2018 16:19:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,409,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="21420644" Received: from yli84-z170x-ud5.fm.intel.com ([10.19.83.14]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2018 16:19:02 -0800 From: Jackie Li To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:16:44 -0800 Message-Id: <1519949806-1138-4-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1519949806-1138-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> References: <1519949806-1138-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 4/6] drm/i915: Add HuC firmware size related restriction for Gen9 and CNL A0 X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On CNL A0 and Gen9, there's a hardware restriction that requires the available GuC WOPCM size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size. This patch adds new verification code to ensure the available GuC WOPCM size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size on both Gen9 and CNL A0. v6: - Extended HuC FW size check against GuC WOPCM size to all Gen9 and CNL A0 platforms v7: - Fixed patch format issues v8: - Renamed variables and functions to avoid ambiguity (Joonas) - Updated commit message and comments to be more comprehensive (Sagar) v9: - Moved code that is not related to restriction check into a separate patch and updated the commit message accordingly (Sagar/Michal) - Avoided to call uc_get_fw_size for better layer isolation (Michal) v10: - Shorten function names and reorganized size_check code to have clear isolation (Joonas) - Removed unnecessary comments (Joonas) v11: - Fixed logic error in size check (Michal) v12: - Add space between "HuC FW" and "(%uKiB)" in error message (Michal) BSpec: 10875 Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: John Spotswood Cc: Jeff McGee Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble (v8) Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko (v11) Signed-off-by: Jackie Li Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c index 237ca03..a94e8f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c @@ -105,8 +105,26 @@ static inline int gen9_check_dword_gap(u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size) return 0; } +static inline int gen9_check_huc_fw_fits(u32 guc_wopcm_size, u32 huc_fw_size) +{ + /* + * On Gen9 & CNL A0, hardware requires the total available GuC WOPCM + * size to be larger than or equal to HuC firmware size. Otherwise, + * firmware uploading would fail. + */ + if (huc_fw_size > guc_wopcm_size - GUC_WOPCM_RESERVED) { + DRM_ERROR("HuC FW (%uKiB) won't fit in GuC WOPCM (%uKiB).\n", + huc_fw_size / 1024, + (guc_wopcm_size - GUC_WOPCM_RESERVED) / 1024); + return -E2BIG; + } + + return 0; +} + static inline int check_hw_restriction(struct drm_i915_private *i915, - u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size) + u32 guc_wopcm_base, u32 guc_wopcm_size, + u32 huc_fw_size) { int err = 0; @@ -115,7 +133,10 @@ static inline int check_hw_restriction(struct drm_i915_private *i915, if (err) return err; - return 0; + if (IS_GEN9(i915) || IS_CNL_REVID(i915, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_A0)) + err = gen9_check_huc_fw_fits(guc_wopcm_size, huc_fw_size); + + return err; } /** @@ -186,7 +207,8 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) return -E2BIG; } - err = check_hw_restriction(i915, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size); + err = check_hw_restriction(i915, guc_wopcm_base, guc_wopcm_size, + huc_fw_size); if (err) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to meet HW restriction.\n"); return err;