Message ID | 1522398722-12161-17-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:32:01 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> wrote: > When SLPC is controlling frequency requests, RPS state related to > autotuning is no longer valid. Make user aware through banner > upfront. Value read from register RPNSWREQ likely has the frequency > requested last by GuC SLPC. > > v1: Replace HAS_SLPC with intel_slpc_active (Paulo) > Avoid magic numbers (Nick) > Use a function for repeated code (Jon) > > v2: Add "SLPC Active" to i915_frequency_info output and > don't update cur_freq as it is driver internal request. (Chris) > > v3: Removing sysfs interface gt_req_freq_mhz out of this patch > for proper division of functionality. (Sagar) > > v4: idle_freq, boost_freq are also not used with SLPC. > > v5: Added SLPC banner to i915_rps_boost_info and keep printing > driver internal values. (Chris) > > v6: Commit message update. > > v7: Rebase. > > v8: Rebase. > > Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> > Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com> > Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 1a66507..5d2ac24 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, > void *unused) > struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps; > int ret = 0; > + if (USES_GUC_SLPC(dev_priv)) > + seq_puts(m, "SLPC Active\n"); > + > intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv)) { > @@ -2209,6 +2212,9 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, > void *data) > struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps; > struct drm_file *file; > + if (USES_GUC_SLPC(dev_priv)) > + seq_puts(m, "SLPC Active\n"); [bikeshed] maybe to match below pattern: seq_puts(m, "SLPC active? %s\n", yesno(true)); or seq_puts(m, "SLPC active? %s\n", yesno((USES_GUC_SLPC(dev_priv))); > + > seq_printf(m, "RPS enabled? %d\n", rps->enabled); > seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s [%d requests]\n", > yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake), dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 1a66507..5d2ac24 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps; int ret = 0; + if (USES_GUC_SLPC(dev_priv)) + seq_puts(m, "SLPC Active\n"); + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv)) { @@ -2209,6 +2212,9 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data) struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps; struct drm_file *file; + if (USES_GUC_SLPC(dev_priv)) + seq_puts(m, "SLPC Active\n"); + seq_printf(m, "RPS enabled? %d\n", rps->enabled); seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s [%d requests]\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake), dev_priv->gt.active_requests);