Message ID | 20170209021828.22813-8-michel.thierry@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On ke, 2017-02-08 at 18:18 -0800, Michel Thierry wrote: > It will make sense once we use the BIT macro. > > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Squash this to the later patch that actually uses these. Regards, Joonas
On 09/02/17 01:57, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ke, 2017-02-08 at 18:18 -0800, Michel Thierry wrote: >> It will make sense once we use the BIT macro. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> > > Squash this to the later patch that actually uses these. > > Regards, Joonas > OK, squashed into the amended "Use BIT macro instead of (1<<x)" patch [https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/138091/]. Thanks for the reviews.
diff --git a/tests/gem_create.c b/tests/gem_create.c index de7b8209..4036dbe6 100644 --- a/tests/gem_create.c +++ b/tests/gem_create.c @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ #include "intel_io.h" #include "intel_chipset.h" #include "igt_aux.h" +#include "igt_bitops.h" #include "drmtest.h" #include "drm.h" #include "i915_drm.h"
It will make sense once we use the BIT macro. Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> --- tests/gem_create.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)