@@ -2448,6 +2448,12 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
wait_queue_head_t poll_wq;
bool pollin;
+ /**
+ * For rate limiting any notifications of spurious
+ * invalid OA reports
+ */
+ struct ratelimit_state spurious_report_rs;
+
bool periodic;
int period_exponent;
@@ -632,7 +632,8 @@ static int gen7_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
* copying it to userspace...
*/
if (report32[0] == 0) {
- DRM_NOTE("Skipping spurious, invalid OA report\n");
+ if (__ratelimit(&dev_priv->perf.oa.spurious_report_rs))
+ DRM_NOTE("Skipping spurious, invalid OA report\n");
continue;
}
@@ -913,6 +914,11 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
oa_put_render_ctx_id(stream);
dev_priv->perf.oa.exclusive_stream = NULL;
+
+ if (dev_priv->perf.oa.spurious_report_rs.missed) {
+ DRM_NOTE("%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to ratelimiting\n",
+ dev_priv->perf.oa.spurious_report_rs.missed);
+ }
}
static void gen7_init_oa_buffer(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -1268,6 +1274,26 @@ static int i915_oa_stream_init(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* We set up some ratelimit state to potentially throttle any _NOTES
+ * about spurious, invalid OA reports which we don't forward to
+ * userspace.
+ *
+ * The initialization is associated with opening the stream (not driver
+ * init) considering we print a _NOTE about any throttling when closing
+ * the stream instead of waiting until driver _fini which no one would
+ * ever see.
+ *
+ * Using the same limiting factors as printk_ratelimit()
+ */
+ ratelimit_state_init(&dev_priv->perf.oa.spurious_report_rs,
+ 5 * HZ, 10);
+ /* Since we use a DRM_NOTE for spurious reports it would be
+ * inconsistent to let __ratelimit() automatically print a warning for
+ * throttling.
+ */
+ ratelimit_set_flags(&dev_priv->perf.oa.spurious_report_rs,
+ RATELIMIT_MSG_ON_RELEASE);
+
stream->sample_size = sizeof(struct drm_i915_perf_record_header);
format_size = dev_priv->perf.oa.oa_formats[props->oa_format].size;