@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->priotree.link);
- rq->priotree.priority = INT_MAX;
__i915_gem_request_submit(rq);
trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, port_index(port, engine));
@@ -487,7 +487,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->priotree.link);
- rq->priotree.priority = INT_MAX;
__i915_gem_request_submit(rq);
trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, port_index(port, engine));
@@ -771,9 +770,17 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
* engines.
*/
list_for_each_entry(p, &pt->signalers_list, signal_link) {
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *s =
+ container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*s), priotree);
+
GEM_BUG_ON(p->signaler->priority < pt->priority);
- if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
- list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
+ if (prio <= READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
+ continue;
+
+ if (i915_gem_request_completed(s))
+ continue;
+
+ list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
}
list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
Since request can be unsubmitted, we need to avoid overriding its priority during submission. Otherwise we won't be able to resubmit it with correct priority. v2: Limit DFS by excluding completed requests (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)