Message ID | 20180219100408.30246-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-02-19 10:04:08) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > > Correct printf format for uint64_t and one "may be uninitialized". > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Fixing those two turned up one more! In file included from ./../lib/igt.h:40:0, from perf_pmu.c:40: perf_pmu.c: In function ‘__real_main1547’: ./../lib/igt_gt.h:111:2: warning: ‘render_fd’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] perf_pmu.c:1761:7: note: ‘render_fd’ was declared here This compiler is easily confused by longjmps @@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ igt_main * Check render nodes are counted. */ igt_subtest_group { - int render_fd; + int render_fd = -1; Throw that in on top and have a Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c index 82053416cbea..8d8dbe397df6 100644 --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ busy_double_start(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e) usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000); val2 = pmu_read_single(fd) - val2; - igt_info("busy=%lu idle=%lu\n", val, val2); + igt_info("busy=%"PRIu64" idle=%"PRIu64"\n", val, val2); igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin[0]); igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin[1]); @@ -340,11 +340,11 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, { const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e_; uint64_t tval[2][num_engines]; + unsigned int busy_idx = 0, i; uint64_t val[num_engines]; int fd[num_engines]; unsigned long slept; igt_spin_t *spin; - unsigned int busy_idx, i; i = 0; fd[0] = -1;