From patchwork Thu Mar 8 15:46:55 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Micha=C5=82_Winiarski?= X-Patchwork-Id: 10268323 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEEC602C8 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81361287E5 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7571C292F5; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9D6287E5 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3E76E95D; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53436E95D for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Mar 2018 07:47:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,441,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="209935965" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2018 07:47:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (172.28.172.64) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 15:47:27 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20Winiarski?= To: Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:46:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20180308154707.21716-3-michal.winiarski@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.3 In-Reply-To: <20180308154707.21716-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com> References: <20180308154707.21716-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.28.172.64] Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC notification handling to separate function X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Michal Wajdeczko To allow future code reuse. While here, fix comment style. v2: Notifications are a separate thing - rename the handler (Sagar) Suggested-by: Oscar Mateo Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Cc: Oscar Mateo Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 33 ++------------------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 633c18785c1e..6b0cd6bc83f8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -1766,37 +1766,8 @@ static void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir) static void gen9_guc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 gt_iir) { - if (gt_iir & GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT) { - /* Sample the log buffer flush related bits & clear them out now - * itself from the message identity register to minimize the - * probability of losing a flush interrupt, when there are back - * to back flush interrupts. - * There can be a new flush interrupt, for different log buffer - * type (like for ISR), whilst Host is handling one (for DPC). - * Since same bit is used in message register for ISR & DPC, it - * could happen that GuC sets the bit for 2nd interrupt but Host - * clears out the bit on handling the 1st interrupt. - */ - u32 msg, flush; - - msg = I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)); - flush = msg & (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED | - INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER); - if (flush) { - /* Clear the message bits that are handled */ - I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), msg & ~flush); - - /* Handle flush interrupt in bottom half */ - queue_work(dev_priv->guc.log.runtime.flush_wq, - &dev_priv->guc.log.runtime.flush_work); - - dev_priv->guc.log.flush_interrupt_count++; - } else { - /* Not clearing of unhandled event bits won't result in - * re-triggering of the interrupt. - */ - } - } + if (gt_iir & GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT) + intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(&dev_priv->guc); } static void i9xx_pipestat_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c index ff08ea0ebf49..25f92291fd40 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c @@ -364,6 +364,43 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len) return ret; } +void intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(struct intel_guc *guc) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc); + u32 msg, flush; + + /* + * Sample the log buffer flush related bits & clear them out now + * itself from the message identity register to minimize the + * probability of losing a flush interrupt, when there are back + * to back flush interrupts. + * There can be a new flush interrupt, for different log buffer + * type (like for ISR), whilst Host is handling one (for DPC). + * Since same bit is used in message register for ISR & DPC, it + * could happen that GuC sets the bit for 2nd interrupt but Host + * clears out the bit on handling the 1st interrupt. + */ + + msg = I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15)); + flush = msg & (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED | + INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER); + if (flush) { + /* Clear the message bits that are handled */ + I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), msg & ~flush); + + /* Handle flush interrupt in bottom half */ + queue_work(guc->log.runtime.flush_wq, + &guc->log.runtime.flush_work); + + guc->log.flush_interrupt_count++; + } else { + /* + * Not clearing of unhandled event bits won't result in + * re-triggering of the interrupt. + */ + } +} + int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h index b9424ac644ac..6d5aebe55039 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int intel_guc_init(struct intel_guc *guc); void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc); int intel_guc_send_nop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len); int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len); +void intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(struct intel_guc *guc); int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc); int intel_guc_auth_huc(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 rsa_offset); int intel_guc_suspend(struct intel_guc *guc);