From patchwork Thu Apr 25 09:45:08 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Gleixner X-Patchwork-Id: 10916601 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A871805 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451D728A08 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 383B928AB0; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D652428A08 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF1F8922A; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a01:7a0:2:106d:700::1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4ED989194; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hJbA3-0001t5-BV; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:59:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20190425094802.533968922@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:45:08 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML References: <20190425094453.875139013@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [patch V3 15/29] dm persistent data: Simplify stack trace handling X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mike Snitzer , David Airlie , Catalin Marinas , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Alexander Potapenko , Christoph Lameter , Miroslav Benes , Christoph Hellwig , Alasdair Kergon , Marek Szyprowski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, David Rientjes , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexey Dobriyan , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Johannes Thumshirn , Akinobu Mita , Steven Rostedt , Josef Bacik , Mike Rapoport , Andy Lutomirski , Josh Poimboeuf , David Sterba , Dmitry Vyukov , Tom Zanussi , Chris Mason , Pekka Enberg , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton , Robin Murphy , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of the storage array based interface. This results in less storage space and indirection. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Mike Snitzer Cc: Alasdair Kergon --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-block-manager.c @@ -35,7 +35,10 @@ #define MAX_HOLDERS 4 #define MAX_STACK 10 -typedef unsigned long stack_entries[MAX_STACK]; +struct stack_store { + unsigned int nr_entries; + unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK]; +}; struct block_lock { spinlock_t lock; @@ -44,8 +47,7 @@ struct block_lock { struct task_struct *holders[MAX_HOLDERS]; #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING - struct stack_trace traces[MAX_HOLDERS]; - stack_entries entries[MAX_HOLDERS]; + struct stack_store traces[MAX_HOLDERS]; #endif }; @@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ static void __add_holder(struct block_lo { unsigned h = __find_holder(lock, NULL); #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING - struct stack_trace *t; + struct stack_store *t; #endif get_task_struct(task); @@ -81,11 +83,7 @@ static void __add_holder(struct block_lo #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING t = lock->traces + h; - t->nr_entries = 0; - t->max_entries = MAX_STACK; - t->entries = lock->entries[h]; - t->skip = 2; - save_stack_trace(t); + t->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(t->entries, MAX_STACK, 2); #endif } @@ -106,7 +104,8 @@ static int __check_holder(struct block_l DMERR("recursive lock detected in metadata"); #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING DMERR("previously held here:"); - print_stack_trace(lock->traces + i, 4); + stack_trace_print(lock->traces[i].entries, + lock->traces[i].nr_entries, 4); DMERR("subsequent acquisition attempted here:"); dump_stack();