From patchwork Wed Aug 14 11:38:21 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michal Wajdeczko X-Patchwork-Id: 11093787 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0120114DB for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E254728763 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D6A98287C6; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F73828763 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FDD6E14F; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B39B6E14F for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2019 04:38:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,385,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="351880607" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2019 04:38:33 -0700 Received: from mwajdecz-MOBL1.ger.corp.intel.com (mwajdecz-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com [10.249.129.194]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id x7EBcOvI019218; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:38:31 +0100 From: Michal Wajdeczko To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:38:21 +0000 Message-Id: <20190814113821.28700-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20190814113821.28700-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> References: <20190814113821.28700-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uc: Move FW size sanity check back to fetch X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Michał Winiarski While we need to know WOPCM size to do this sanity check, it has more to do with FW than with WOPCM. Let's move the check to fetch phase, it's not like WOPCM is going to grow in the meantime. v2: rebased Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Jackie Li Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 14 ++------------ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c index d056e1f4bd6d..98cb0eff143f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct drm_i915_private *i915) size_t size; int err; + GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->wopcm.size); GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_fw_supported(uc_fw)); err = i915_inject_load_error(i915, -ENXIO); @@ -324,6 +325,16 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct drm_i915_private *i915) goto fail; } + /* Sanity check whether this fw is not larger than whole WOPCM memory */ + size = sizeof(struct uc_css_header) + uc_fw->ucode_size; + if (unlikely(size >= i915->wopcm.size)) { + dev_warn(dev, "%s firmware %s: invalid size: %zu > %zu\n", + intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), uc_fw->path, + size, (size_t)i915->wopcm.size); + err = -E2BIG; + goto fail; + } + /* Get version numbers from the CSS header */ switch (uc_fw->type) { case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC: diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c index e5bc7b8a433e..295978356eef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size); GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.base); GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.size); + GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size); + GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size); if (i915_inject_probe_failure(i915)) return; @@ -209,18 +211,6 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) goto check; } - if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) { - DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.", - guc_fw_size / 1024); - return; - } - - if (huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) { - DRM_ERROR("HuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.", - huc_fw_size / 1024); - return; - } - guc_wopcm_base = ALIGN(huc_fw_size + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE, GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_ALIGNMENT); if ((guc_wopcm_base + ctx_rsvd) >= wopcm->size) {