| Message ID | 20190906054255.GC3458@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [PULL] gvt-next-fixes | expand |
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > Thanks. > -- > The following changes since commit c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 pulled, thanks > > for you to fetch changes up to 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Weinan Li (1): > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > -- > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
Hi guys, On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > Thanks. > -- > The following changes since commit c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > for you to fetch changes up to 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) $ dim pull-request-next-fixes Using drm/drm-next as the upstream dim: 4a5322560aa2 ("drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915"): Link tag missing. dim: 0a3242bdb477 ("drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly"): Link tag missing. dim: ERROR: issues in commits detected, aborting I wonder how I should proceed here. In the past I was always bypasssing dim, but now that drm maintainers also use dim I'm sure this will blow up there anyways. But gvt patches are not tracked on our CI individually hence they don't have Links. Jani, Joonas, how are you guys handling this? Daniel, Dave, ideas? Thanks, Rodrigo. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Weinan Li (1): > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > -- > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 10:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi guys, > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > The following changes since commit > > c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement > > and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019- > > 09-06 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to > > 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is > > submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) > > $ dim pull-request-next-fixes > Using drm/drm-next as the upstream > dim: 4a5322560aa2 ("drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when > the context is submitted to i915"): Link tag missing. > dim: 0a3242bdb477 ("drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer > correctly"): Link tag missing. > dim: ERROR: issues in commits detected, aborting > > I wonder how I should proceed here. In the past I was always > bypasssing dim, > but now that drm maintainers also use dim I'm sure this will blow up > there anyways. > > But gvt patches are not tracked on our CI individually hence they > don't > have Links. > > Jani, Joonas, how are you guys handling this? > > Daniel, Dave, ideas? dim doesn't require Link: tags yet for pull requests (because most drm trees aren't managed by dim and so lack them). Until we change that, with some doc patches and proper bikeshed on dri-devel I think it's fine if gvt is missing them. At least from a drm.git pov. What you guys want to do for drm-intel.git is entirely up to you. -Daniel > > Thanks, > Rodrigo. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Weinan Li (1): > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context > > is submitted to i915 > > > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 > > Intel Semiconductor AG Registered No. 020.30.913.786-7 Registered Office: Badenerstrasse 549, 8048 Zurich, Switzerland
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:54:59PM -0700, Vetter, Daniel wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 10:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > > > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > > The following changes since commit > > > c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > > > > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement > > > and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019- > > > 09-06 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to > > > 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is > > > submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) > > > > $ dim pull-request-next-fixes > > Using drm/drm-next as the upstream > > dim: 4a5322560aa2 ("drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when > > the context is submitted to i915"): Link tag missing. > > dim: 0a3242bdb477 ("drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer > > correctly"): Link tag missing. > > dim: ERROR: issues in commits detected, aborting > > > > I wonder how I should proceed here. In the past I was always > > bypasssing dim, > > but now that drm maintainers also use dim I'm sure this will blow up > > there anyways. > > > > But gvt patches are not tracked on our CI individually hence they > > don't > > have Links. > > > > Jani, Joonas, how are you guys handling this? > > > > Daniel, Dave, ideas? > > dim doesn't require Link: tags yet for pull requests (because most drm > trees aren't managed by dim and so lack them). I'm confused now. function dim_pull_request calls checkpatch_commit_push_range 1 "$upstream..$branch" (except for drm-intel-next) and checkpatch_commit_push checks for the link. So if you also use dim for your pull request I'm wondering how you are not getting that.... In the past whenever I had this problem on dinf I commented out the link check but end up never coming back to solve the problem properly. I just wondering that now that dim is in use on drm level if I bypass here it becomes a problem for you. thoughts? > Until we change that, > with some doc patches and proper bikeshed on dri-devel I think it's > fine if gvt is missing them. At least from a drm.git pov. > > What you guys want to do for drm-intel.git is entirely up to you. > -Daniel > > > > Thanks, > > Rodrigo. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > > > > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > > > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Weinan Li (1): > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context > > > is submitted to i915 > > > > > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > > > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > > > > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 > > > >
On 2019.09.09 15:35:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:54:59PM -0700, Vetter, Daniel wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 10:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > > > > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > > > The following changes since commit > > > > c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > > > > > > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement > > > > and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019- > > > > 09-06 > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to > > > > 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > > > > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is > > > > submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) > > > > > > $ dim pull-request-next-fixes > > > Using drm/drm-next as the upstream > > > dim: 4a5322560aa2 ("drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when > > > the context is submitted to i915"): Link tag missing. > > > dim: 0a3242bdb477 ("drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer > > > correctly"): Link tag missing. > > > dim: ERROR: issues in commits detected, aborting > > > > > > I wonder how I should proceed here. In the past I was always > > > bypasssing dim, > > > but now that drm maintainers also use dim I'm sure this will blow up > > > there anyways. > > > > > > But gvt patches are not tracked on our CI individually hence they > > > don't > > > have Links. > > > > > > Jani, Joonas, how are you guys handling this? > > > > > > Daniel, Dave, ideas? > > > > dim doesn't require Link: tags yet for pull requests (because most drm > > trees aren't managed by dim and so lack them). > > I'm confused now. > > function dim_pull_request > calls > checkpatch_commit_push_range 1 "$upstream..$branch" > (except for drm-intel-next) > > and checkpatch_commit_push checks for the link. > > So if you also use dim for your pull request I'm wondering how you > are not getting that.... > > In the past whenever I had this problem on dinf I commented out the > link check but end up never coming back to solve the problem properly. > I just wondering that now that dim is in use on drm level if I bypass > here it becomes a problem for you. > > thoughts? Although gvt is not fully in CI yet, we do have patchwork that I can add Link: tag, that should be easy for you. Sorry that I wasn't awared it's required for dim. > > > Until we change that, > > with some doc patches and proper bikeshed on dri-devel I think it's > > fine if gvt is missing them. At least from a drm.git pov. > > > > What you guys want to do for drm-intel.git is entirely up to you. > > -Daniel > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rodrigo. > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > > > > > > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > > > > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Weinan Li (1): > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context > > > > is submitted to i915 > > > > > > > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > > > > > > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > intel-gvt-dev mailing list > intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gvt-dev
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 15:35 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:54:59PM -0700, Vetter, Daniel wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 10:24 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:42:55PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent > > > > guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > > > The following changes since commit > > > > c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: > > > > > > > > drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, > > > > retirement > > > > and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes- > > > > 2019- > > > > 09-06 > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to > > > > 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: > > > > > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context > > > > is > > > > submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) > > > > > > $ dim pull-request-next-fixes > > > Using drm/drm-next as the upstream > > > dim: 4a5322560aa2 ("drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU > > > when > > > the context is submitted to i915"): Link tag missing. > > > dim: 0a3242bdb477 ("drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head > > > pointer > > > correctly"): Link tag missing. > > > dim: ERROR: issues in commits detected, aborting > > > > > > I wonder how I should proceed here. In the past I was always > > > bypasssing dim, > > > but now that drm maintainers also use dim I'm sure this will blow > > > up > > > there anyways. > > > > > > But gvt patches are not tracked on our CI individually hence they > > > don't > > > have Links. > > > > > > Jani, Joonas, how are you guys handling this? > > > > > > Daniel, Dave, ideas? > > > > dim doesn't require Link: tags yet for pull requests (because most > > drm > > trees aren't managed by dim and so lack them). > > I'm confused now. > > function dim_pull_request > calls > checkpatch_commit_push_range 1 "$upstream..$branch" > (except for drm-intel-next) > > and checkpatch_commit_push checks for the link. > > So if you also use dim for your pull request I'm wondering how you > are not getting that.... On the push side we set dim_managed_branch (or whatever it's called) to 1, on the pull side it's side 0. That disables certain checks like the Link: tag check. Also push should only check commits authored by you, so this is only really an issue with cherry-picks. That was at least the idea behind all this, maybe it stopped working. -Daniel > > In the past whenever I had this problem on dinf I commented out the > link check but end up never coming back to solve the problem > properly. > I just wondering that now that dim is in use on drm level if I bypass > here it becomes a problem for you. > > thoughts? > > > Until we change that, > > with some doc patches and proper bikeshed on dri-devel I think it's > > fine if gvt is missing them. At least from a drm.git pov. > > > > What you guys want to do for drm-intel.git is entirely up to you. > > -Daniel > > > Thanks, > > > Rodrigo. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- > > > > gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 > > > > > > > > - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) > > > > - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- > > > > Weinan Li (1): > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the > > > > context > > > > is submitted to i915 > > > > > > > > Xiaolin Zhang (1): > > > > drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > > > > > > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 Intel Semiconductor AG Registered No. 020.30.913.786-7 Registered Office: Badenerstrasse 549, 8048 Zurich, Switzerland
Hi, Here's gvt-next-fixes with two recent fixes, one for recent guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. Thanks. -- The following changes since commit c36beba6b296b3c05a0f29753b04775e5ae23886: drm/i915: Seal races between async GPU cancellation, retirement and signaling (2019-05-13 13:53:35 +0300) are available in the Git repository at: https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux.git tags/gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 for you to fetch changes up to 4a5322560aa235efa84c0aa34c00e5749a0792fd: drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 (2019-09-06 13:39:09 +0800) ---------------------------------------------------------------- gvt-next-fixes-2019-09-06 - Fix guest context head pointer update for hang (Xiaolin) - Fix guest context ring state for reset (Weinan) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Weinan Li (1): drm/i915/gvt: update RING_START reg of vGPU when the context is submitted to i915 Xiaolin Zhang (1): drm/i915/gvt: update vgpu workload head pointer correctly drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)