From patchwork Thu May 7 18:54:08 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" X-Patchwork-Id: 11537219 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2E614C0 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E133621655 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mcn5Al1a" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E133621655 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895506E261; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:52:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E376E18F for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from embeddedor (unknown [189.207.59.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C02324957; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:49:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588877381; bh=sEFdBDVeUa29FP+5J+FWkQjaGTd7YhVbv31P4E7P2jU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=mcn5Al1aAEKclx5SWiiJdTsd2kLre8tYrNjIJxRKV59x1Fz+2iuR6swGbY0XCvIX8 VG5jAUsgI6x4FCIUCuSkl+x3dEbHbzfvc2vBxyeF9OtS4Zxjdk1joHcNO7kzRPpegt juBi/XUi3za70peyxfgkupEvrs1al4jGTuUE22rc= Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 13:54:08 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi Message-ID: <20200507185408.GA14561@embeddedor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 May 2020 16:52:09 +0000 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h index 05c7cbe32eb4..aef7fe932d1a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ struct bdb_general_definitions { * number = (block_size - sizeof(bdb_general_definitions))/ * defs->child_dev_size; */ - u8 devices[0]; + u8 devices[]; } __packed; /* @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ struct bdb_mipi_config { struct bdb_mipi_sequence { u8 version; - u8 data[0]; /* up to 6 variable length blocks */ + u8 data[]; /* up to 6 variable length blocks */ } __packed; /* diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index 683014e7bc51..f42c99da2580 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ struct virtual_engine { /* And finally, which physical engines this virtual engine maps onto. */ unsigned int num_siblings; - struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[0]; + struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[]; }; static struct virtual_engine *to_virtual_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h index 0d1f6c8ff355..5a6561f7a210 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct i915_vma_coredump { int num_pages; int page_count; int unused; - u32 *pages[0]; + u32 *pages[]; }; struct i915_request_coredump {