From patchwork Tue Oct 26 11:40:54 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior X-Patchwork-Id: 12584657 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8345FC433F5 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5177860C4B for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:41:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5177860C4B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51836E593; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B254A6E41B; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:41:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1635248466; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iJiIfR6mr75TRNVvBVBFQnoSa1tOGFCvEnhQ+nKMAzk=; b=wkIBTuZ7EkUJIDzu+4RwXR6Kad69hJ02RpNvooXYYHt4OnWDHEtMcCNLYbCLWBK6HtWl+0 TK5BgKkfEkRzTB3rEbySVM4OiH98HERlvCpcm1CcQlMN1fc0FNvy18Qr1iU1rsNEHT07VX ilhbUO3rCm1Zd5Mawma5lZAH8ZhHRC3xx2p70pEk9SSSer2gMqoNk7Q5SIwtgd9HWD0ojZ mAOia1XV9/f8squt2dwGGy1Q9G1QTesMo7Xl+rDJxFeUtDh4cStOXWNXLjX9s9ZB4fD+Uw W2mLIu7W2ZQst5AmD/vYdWRU/RxYa6sq2iqTk52bIQkJzi5Kz+XUcGhEP/+uVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1635248466; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iJiIfR6mr75TRNVvBVBFQnoSa1tOGFCvEnhQ+nKMAzk=; b=U+7H7faKnuyHInO+ImDN8ii6xGclTJr/i5tDs32PfgIqGTZasm+EZByjR9Hin4lmTx5PrR Whj/Jqw5Vw6lKJAQ== To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Clark Williams , Maarten Lankhorst Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:40:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20211026114100.2593433-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20211026114100.2593433-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20211026114100.2593433-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" execlists_dequeue() is invoked from a function which uses local_irq_disable() to disable interrupts so the spin_lock() behaves like spin_lock_irq(). This breaks PREEMPT_RT because local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() is not the same as spin_lock_irq(). execlists_dequeue_irq() and execlists_dequeue() has each one caller only. If intel_engine_cs::active::lock is acquired and released with the _irq suffix then it behaves almost as if execlists_dequeue() would be invoked with disabled interrupts. The difference is the last part of the function which is then invoked with enabled interrupts. I can't tell if this makes a difference. From looking at it, it might work to move the last unlock at the end of the function as I didn't find anything that would acquire the lock again. Reported-by: Clark Williams Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c index bedb80057046a..1dbcac05f44eb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * and context switches) submission. */ - spin_lock(&sched_engine->lock); + spin_lock_irq(&sched_engine->lock); /* * If the queue is higher priority than the last @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * Even if ELSP[1] is occupied and not worthy * of timeslices, our queue might be. */ - spin_unlock(&sched_engine->lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&sched_engine->lock); return; } } @@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) { spin_unlock(&ve->base.sched_engine->lock); - spin_unlock(&engine->sched_engine->lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&engine->sched_engine->lock); return; /* leave this for another sibling */ } @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) */ sched_engine->queue_priority_hint = queue_prio(sched_engine); i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine); - spin_unlock(&sched_engine->lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&sched_engine->lock); /* * We can skip poking the HW if we ended up with exactly the same set @@ -1598,13 +1598,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) } } -static void execlists_dequeue_irq(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) -{ - local_irq_disable(); /* Suspend interrupts across request submission */ - execlists_dequeue(engine); - local_irq_enable(); /* flush irq_work (e.g. breadcrumb enabling) */ -} - static void clear_ports(struct i915_request **ports, int count) { memset_p((void **)ports, NULL, count); @@ -2424,7 +2417,7 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t) } if (!engine->execlists.pending[0]) { - execlists_dequeue_irq(engine); + execlists_dequeue(engine); start_timeslice(engine); }