@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ static int intel_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_connector *connector
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->dev);
struct intel_crtc *crtc;
- seq_printf(m, "DRRS type: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "Type: %s\n",
intel_drrs_type_str(intel_panel_drrs_type(intel_connector)));
for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
@@ -1087,16 +1087,16 @@ static int intel_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_connector *connector
mutex_lock(&crtc->drrs.mutex);
/* DRRS Supported */
- seq_printf(m, "DRRS Enabled: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n",
str_yes_no(crtc_state->has_drrs));
- seq_printf(m, "DRRS Active: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "Active: %s\n",
str_yes_no(intel_drrs_is_active(crtc)));
seq_printf(m, "Busy_frontbuffer_bits: 0x%X\n",
crtc->drrs.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
- seq_printf(m, "DRRS refresh rate: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "Refresh rate: %s\n",
crtc->drrs.refresh_rate == DRRS_REFRESH_RATE_LOW ?
"low" : "high");
User-space parsing of i915_drrs_status is already broken so lets use this oportunity to drop those repeated "DRRS". It is the DRRS status debugfs so all of this information is related to DRRS and there is no need to mention it each time. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)