From patchwork Thu Jun 9 16:51:59 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bob Beckett X-Patchwork-Id: 12875812 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0D4CCA47E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800F411B0AB; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E44C11AB75; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes-devbox.fritz.box (82-71-8-225.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.8.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbeckett) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBC5266017EC; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:52:27 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1654793548; bh=8vOVoJXWNBNoAe7uHxF6kK6AtRixKpYtIjs6ocUktn4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xihi5B5e5WHHgSAo6HedsLzSorg92CMGBrBGBqJ8uY5Rml9yp9GaLMXyJQd4zgYlx fQkX7x3wfEaMEqebyc8LVvxtzhtrGJRDpOF0bDzklafhaUfcCX23O6Y0FG45CJ4u+V 9zOdG/94nIeKMjWDxshowaCqawMaXhT+/+2yaSI3Hi3PVnw4MCDOqc8hBBfK8wKcKa BEC7VtPddb3oRQMdf4zH1YaSfRassGwea/vyR4N4hhYRB19ri/6DhRHtmDK4xToKwh Nvk1vqQij6fdjd2amg4aJN3DexdQdMb7j6sWxIa+0sGXNpb6Kg0AEpxvV5r1ZKCRCq v/4cMtg3TG6vA== From: Robert Beckett To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:51:59 +0000 Message-Id: <20220609165200.842821-8-bob.beckett@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220609165200.842821-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> References: <20220609165200.842821-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/i915/ttm: only trust snooping for dgfx when deciding default cache_level X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , kernel@collabora.com, Matthew Auld , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" By default i915_ttm_cache_level() decides I915_CACHE_LLC if HAS_SNOOP. This is divergent from existing backends code which only considers HAS_LLC. Testing shows that trusting snooping on gen5- is unreliable and bsw via ggtt mappings, so limit DGFX for now and maintain previous behaviour. Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c index 4c1de0b4a10f..40249fa28a7a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ static enum i915_cache_level i915_ttm_cache_level(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct ttm_resource *res, struct ttm_tt *ttm) { - return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || HAS_SNOOP(i915)) && + bool can_snoop = HAS_SNOOP(i915) && IS_DGFX(i915); + + return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || can_snoop) && !i915_ttm_gtt_binds_lmem(res) && ttm->caching == ttm_cached) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;